IN THE JUDICATURE OF HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 8585 OF 2026 Dnyanoba Prabhu Bargaje and Others VERSUS State of Maharashtra Through Its Additional Divisional Commissioner … Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. S. E. Shekade AGP for Respondents-State : Mr. R. K. Ingole … CORAM : S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J. Dated : July 27, 2026 PER COURT :- 1. Heard. 2. The present Writ Petition takes exception to the order dated 07/05/2026 passed by the Additional Divisional Commissioner, Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar in File No.2026/ ROR/ RAV/ CR-97, by which the petitioners' application for stay to the order passed by the Additional Collector is rejected. 3. Perusal of the record indicates that the rights of the parties are sub-judice before this Court in Second Appeal No.689 of 2022, which is filed against the judgment and decree dated 03/08/2022 passed by the District Judge, Ambajogai in Regular Civil Appeal No.28 of 2016. The order impugned seeks to give effect to the decree as passed by the District Judge. Page 1 of 2 2026:BHC-AUG:31102 66 WP 8585-2026 4. In this background, this Court does not find any reason to interfere in the impugned order. However, it would be in the fitness of things if the learned Additional Divisional Commissioner decides the pending revision within a period of four months from today after giving opportunity to both the sides. With the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of. 5. Needless to state that if any change in the mutation record is made during the pendency of the appeal, it shall be subject to the final decision of the revision before the Additional Divisional Commissioner as well as the second appeal pending before this Court. ( S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J. ) vj gawade/-. Page 2 of 2