Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 29967 (PAT)

Deepu Sharma v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./879/2026 · 2026-01-21

Prabhat Kumar Singh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.879 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-81 Year-2025 Thana- GOPALPUR District- West Champaran ====================================================== Deepu Sharma Son of Pramod Sharma Resident Of Village- Jhakhra Ward No 4 Ps -Gopalpur District - West Champaran ,bettiah ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Jhunu Sharma Son of Late Belash Sharma Resident Of Village- Jhakhra Ps -Gopalpur District - West Champaran ,bettiah ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mritunjay Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Shahabuddin Azeem @ S. Azeem, APP For the O.P. No. 2 : Mr. Sachida Nand Rai, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 21-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, informant and the State. 2. Petitioner apprehends arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 118(1), 115(2), 126(2), 109, 124(1) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. 3. As per F.I.R., this petitioner assaulted on the head of informant with farsa and threw acid on his son when he came to save the informant. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Though petitioner is alleged to have thrown acid but as per injury report, no one sustained any injury from acid which itself falsifies the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.879 of 2026(2) dt.21-01-2026 2/2 prosecution case. Injury, allegedly, caused by the petitioner is simple in nature. Petitioner claims clean antecedent. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State as well as learned counsel for the informant vehemently opposed the bail application. 6. Considering backdrop of the case, nature of accusation, injury and clean antecedent, this anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that let the above named petitioner in the event of his arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate-I, West Champaran at Bettiah in connection with Gopalpur P. S. Case No. 81 of 2025, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. Navya/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T