Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
23/07/2026 D/L – 277 Court No.35 S. Kundu
C.R.M.(M) 1473 of 2026
In Re: An application for bail under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023. In connection with Jaynagar P.S Case no. 525 of 2023 dated 24/11/2023 under sections 498A/302 of the IPC. In the matter of: Parimal Baidya …Petitioner. Mr. Uttam Kr. Halder …for the petitioner. Ms. Priti Kar Bagchi …for the State.
Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody for two years eight months and only two witnesses have been examined out of the 19 witnesses cited by the prosecution and the evidence of the third witnesses is in progress. There is no possibility of the trial being taken to its logical conclusion. As such the petitioner be released on bail. Learned advocate for the State has referred to the statement under Section 180 as well as the Section 183 of the BNSS as well as the post-mortem report. Post-mortem report reflects that the throat of the wife of the victim was split along with other injuries available on the person of the deceased. Emphasis has been made by the learned advocate in respect of the evidence of the child. From where the learned advocate for the petitioner submits that there is a possibility of tutoring the child.
2
Be that as it may, such appreciation is to be considered at the end of trial court. Materials presently which are appearing do make out a heinous offence. At this stage, as such, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. However, the learned trial court would within a period of ten months complete the vulnerable witnesses cited by the prosecution. The petitioner would renew his prayer for bail after the aforesaid time period is over. Accordingly, CRM (M) 1473 of 2026 is dismissed. Memo of evidence filed by the State is taken on record. All parties shall act on the basis of the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)