Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 29963 (CAL)

MD. SARIFUL ISLAM @ SORIFUL ISLAM @ SORIF v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM (A)/1895/2026 · 2026-07-22

Tirthankar Ghosh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

22.07.2026 Court No.35. D/L.703. Rakib (Rejected) CRM (A) 1895 of 2026 In Re: An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Lalgola Police Station case no. 833 of 2025 dated 19.11.2025 under Sections 21(c)/29 of the NDPS Act. And In the matter of : Md. Sariful Islam @ Soriful Islam @ Sorif. ……Petitioner. Mr. Navanil De Mr. Srinjan Ghosh .....for the Petitioner. Mr. Koustav Lal Mukherjee ……for the State. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner prays for renewal of the prayer for anticipatory bail. Learned advocate appearing for the State submits that there are criminal antecedents of the present petitioner. The concept of bail and anticipatory bail are completely different. As such, the prayer so advanced by the petitioner is refused. Thus, CRM (A) 1895 of 2026 is dismissed. Memo of evidence submitted by the State be kept with the record. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)