Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 29962 (CHH)

DHAN BAI v. SHASHIKANT JAISWAL

MCC/695/2026 · 2026-07-30

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010281092026 2026:CGHC:33258 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 695 of 2026 1. Dhan Bai W/o Shri Darbari Jaiswal Aged About 55 Years R/o Village Motiyari, Tahsil Kawardha, District Kawardha (Kabirdham) Chhattisgarh 2. Panbai W/o Shri Beduram Jaiswal Aged About 53 Years R/o Village Marka, Tahsil Kawardha, District Kabirdham Kawardha Chhattisgarh 3. Shyam Bai D/o Shri Bhagwan Jaiswal Aged About 50 Years R/o Village Surjpura, Tahsil Kawardha, District Kawardha Kabirdham Chhattisgarh 4. Kalabai D/o Shri Komal Jaiswal Aged About 48 Years R/o Village Biptara, Tahsil Kawardha, District Kawardha Kabirdham Chhattisgarh 5. Rikhi Ram S/o Late Dauram Jaiswal Aged About 42 Years R/o Village Marka, Tahsil Kawardha, District Kawardha Kabirdham Chhattisgarh 6. Sushila Bai W/o Shri Nemichand Aged About 42 Years R/o Village Khadauda, Tahsil And District Kabirdham, District Kawardha Kabirdham Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. Shashikant Jaiswal S/o Shri Kawal Ram Jaiswal Aged About 38 Years R/o Ward No. 12, Kawardha, District Kabirdham Chhattigsarh 2. Kawal Ram S/o Shri Dau Ram Jaiswal Aged About 58 Years R/o Village Marka, Tahsil And District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh 3. Tirath Ram S/o Late Dauram Jaiswal Aged About 42 Years R/o Village Marka, Tahsil Kawardha, District Kawardha Kabirdham Chhattisgarh 4. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector, Kabirdham, District Kawardha Kabirdham Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) (Cause title is taken from Case Information System) JYOTI SHARMA Digitally signed by JYOTI SHARMA Date: 2026.07.31 16:55:05 +0530 2 For Petitioner : Mr. Anand Kesharwani, Advocate For Respondents/ State : Mr. K.G. Yadav, Dy. G.A. For Respondent No. 1 : Mr. Surendra Dewangan, Advocate (HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE BIBHU DATTA GURU) Order on Board 31/07/2026 1. This MCC has been filed for restoration of REVP No. 160 of 2026 which was dismissed for want of prosecution by this Court vide order dated 08.07.2026. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the above matter was listed on 08.07.2026 but due to some bonafide mistake, he could not appear before this Court and the case was dismissed for want of prosecution. 3. On due consideration, the submission made by the counsel for the petitioner and the pleadings made in the MCC, it is allowed. REVP No. 160 of 2026 is restored to its original number subject to payment of cost of Rs. 3,000/- to be deposited before the Chhattisgarh High Court Bar Association Library Fund. Sd/- (BIBHU DATTA GURU) JUDGE Jyoti