Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 29958 (PAT)

Anil Kumar Sahani v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./3989/2026 · 2026-02-03

Prabhat Kumar Singh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3989 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-174 Year-2022 Thana- BIRAUL District- Darbhanga ====================================================== 1. Anil Kumar Sahani Son of Heera Sahani @ Hira Sahani Resident of Vill- Rupnagar, P.O-Neuri, P.S- Biraul, Dist- Darbhanga 2. Raja @ Chandan Sahani @ Chandan Kumar Sahni @ Raja Sahani Son of Heera Sahani @ Hira Sahani Resident of Vill- Rupnagar, P.O-Neuri, P.S- Biraul, Dist- Darbhanga 3. Sunil Kumar @ Sunil Kumar Sahani @ Sunil Kumar Sahni Son of Heera Sahani @ Hira Sahani Resident of Vill- Rupnagar, P.O-Neuri, P.S- Biraul, Dist- Darbhanga 4. Hira Sahani @ Heera Sahani Son of Late Mahabir Sahni @ Mahaveer Sahani Resident of Vill- Rupnagar, P.O-Neuri, P.S- Biraul, Dist- Darbhanga ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Keshav Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Harendra Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 03-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Petitioners apprehend arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 448, 504, 341, 323, 324, 308, 354B, 379/34. 3. As per FIR, these petitioners abused and assaulted the informant and others by means of lathi, danda, iron rod, tangi. They also tried to outrage modesty of informant. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that due to ongoing dispute of land boundary, scuffle took place between the parties in which both sides inflicted Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3989 of 2026(2) dt.03-02-2026 2/2 injuries on each other. Case and counter case. Injury caused by these petitioners are simple in nature. Rest of the allegations are ornamental in nature. 5. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail. 6. Considering the facts of the case, prayer for bail of these petitioners is allowed. In the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let these petitioners, named above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate IV, in Biraul Police Station Case No. 174 of 2022/GR No. 343 of 2022, subject to the conditions laid down under section 482 Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. shashi/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T