Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:10165 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 1861 of 2026
Alamgir Ansari, son of Md. Keyamuddin Ansari … … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
… … Opp. Party
---
CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY ---
For the Petitioner
: Mr. Anjani Kumar Singh, Advocate
For the Opp. Party
: Mr. Shailendra Kumar Tiwari, Advocate
---
05/8th April 2026
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody in connection with Giridih (Cyber) P.S. Case No. 43 of 2025 for the offence registered under Section 111(2) (ii)/111(3)/111 (4)/317(5)/318 (4)/338 /336 (3)/319 (2)/340 (2)/3 (5) of B.N.S. and Section 66 (B)/66 (C)/66 (D) of Ι.Τ. Act, now said to have been pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum-Special Judge (Cyber Crime), Giridih.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 30.12.2025. The learned counsel submits that similarly situated co-accused, namely, Md. Sarafat Ansari @ Sarafat Ansari has been granted bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court in B.A. No. 2058 of 2026 vide order dated 17.03.2026 and against Md. Sarafat Ansari, there was allegation of much larger amount and there were four victims in his connection and so far as the petitioner is concerned, total amount involved is Rs. 80,000/- and there are two victims so far.
3.
Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer and has submitted that there are numerous cyber links amongst various devices to put this case under organized crime. However, other submissions made by the
learned counsel for the petitioner are not in dispute.
4. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that the case of the petitioner is on better footing than the co-accused,
2026:JHHC:10165 2
namely, Md. Sarafat Ansari @ Sarafat Ansari, who has been granted bail by this Court in B.A. No. 2058 of 2026, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty-Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum-Special Judge (Cyber Crime), Giridih in connection with Giridih (Cyber) P.S. Case No. 43 of 2025, subject to the following conditions: - (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of his single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner would deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his Mobile Number before the learned court below, which he shall not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned court below.
5. The instant bail application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions.
6. Let a copy of this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through ‘e- mail/FAX’.
(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.)
Dated: 08.04.2026
Uploaded On: 09.04.2026
Mukul/-