Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 29941 (CAL)

MITALI DAS @ RINKU DAS v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM(M)/1429/2026 · 2026-07-22

Tirthankar Ghosh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

22/07/2026 D/L – 266 Court No.35 S. Kundu C.R.M.(M) 1429 of 2026 In Re: An application for bail under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023. In connection with Suti P.S Case no. 36 of 2026 dated 15/01/2026 under sections 103(1)/109/123/3(5) of the BNS. In the matter of: Mitali Das @ Rinku Das …Petitioner. Mr. Satadru Lahiri Mr. Md. Anwar Hossain Ms. Benagir Hasna Mr. A. Islam …for the petitioner. Mr. Somnath Adhikary Mr. Sanjib Das …for the State. Memo of evidence filed on behalf of the State is taken on record. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody for six months. There is no possibility of the trial commencing very soon, as the case till date has not been committed. Learned advocate for the State has drawn the attention of the Court to the post-mortem report as well as the statement under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the victim. So far as the other accused is concerned, he is absconding. Having regard to the materials, which are appearing and the case is yet to be committed to the Court of Sessions. 2 At this stage, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, CRM (M) 1429 of 2026 is dismissed. The learned Magistrate in seisin of the matter would take steps by adhering to the provisions of Section 32 of the BNSS. All parties shall act on the basis of the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)