Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 29929 (PNJ)

NARSHI SHARMA v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CWP/20258/2026 · 2026-07-08

Tribhuvan Dahiya

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA 132 NARSHI SHARMA STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS CORAM: Present: TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA mandamus directing the respondents to release the outstanding amount of ₹50,32,906, against the bills detailed in the document, Annexure P Public Health Engineering related eighteen per cent per annum 2. Kumar, Executive Engineer, PHED, Division no.2, sanctioned amount against the aforesaid bills within a period of 3. petitioner has no objection to the petition being disposed of in terms thereof. 4. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP- Date of decision: July 08, 2026 NARSHI SHARMA Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Mr. Dinesh Arora, Advocate and Mr. Jatin Sehra, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Bhupender Singh, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (ORAL) The petition has been filed directing the respondents to release the outstanding amount of , against the bills detailed in the document, Annexure P Public Health Engineering related works, along with interest at the rate of eighteen per cent per annum. Learned State counsel, on instructions from Sh. Sandeep Kumar, Executive Engineer, PHED, Division no.2, sanctioned amount against the aforesaid bills a period of four months. In view of the statement made, learned counsel for the petitioner has no objection to the petition being disposed of in terms thereof. Ordered accordingly. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -20258-2026 Date of decision: July 08, 2026 ...Petitioner ...Respondents TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Mr. Dinesh Arora, Advocate and Mr. Bhupender Singh, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. The petition has been filed inter alia seeking a writ of directing the respondents to release the outstanding amount of , against the bills detailed in the document, Annexure P-2, for works, along with interest at the rate of Learned State counsel, on instructions from Sh. Sandeep Kumar, Executive Engineer, PHED, Division no.2, Rohtak, submits that the sanctioned amount against the aforesaid bills will be paid to the petitioner e statement made, learned counsel for the petitioner has no objection to the petition being disposed of in terms thereof. ...Petitioner ...Respondents seeking a writ of directing the respondents to release the outstanding amount of 2, for works, along with interest at the rate of Learned State counsel, on instructions from Sh. Sandeep the to the petitioner e statement made, learned counsel for the JASPREET KAUR 2026.07.15 11:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh CWP-20258-2026 -2- 5. In case the due amount is not paid within four months from today, it shall carry interest at the rate of twelve per cent per annum thereafter till the date of actual payment. July 08, 2026 (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) Jaspreet Kaur JUDGE  Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No JASPREET KAUR 2026.07.15 11:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh