Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2992 (JHR)

SOIBUR SK @ SAIBUR SHEKH @ SOIBUR SHEKH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./12088/2025 · 2026-04-07

Anubha Rawat Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:9778 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 12088 of 2025 Soibur Sk. @ Saibur Shekh @ Soibur Shekh, son of Majibur Shekh @ Mojid Shekh … … Petitioner Versus State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Indu Shekhar Gupta, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Naveen Kr. Ganjhu, Advocate --- 07/07.04.2026 Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 13.08.2025 in connection with Pakur (T) P.S. Case No. 217 of 2025, (Sessions Trial No.173 of 2025), registered under Section 103 (1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, now pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge – I, Pakur. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that as per the allegation, the petitioner and the victim had been living together for three months prior to the alleged occurrence and the victim had committed suicide. He has further submitted that it has been alleged that the victim took divorce from her first husband on the promise of marriage made by the petitioner and the petitioner was already married. The learned counsel has further submitted that there is no sign of any assault on the body of the victim and she died due to asphyxia. 4. The learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for bail. 5. After hearing the learned counsels for the parties and considering the aforesaid facts as stated by the learned counsel for the petitioner and not disputed by the learned counsel for the State, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees twenty-five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions 2026:JHHC:9778 2 Judge – I, Pakur in connection with Pakur (T) P.S. Case No. 217 of 2025, (Sessions Trial No.173 of 2025), on the following conditions: (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of even single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned trial court. 6. The instant application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. 7. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the learned court concerned through “FAX/email”. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Date of Order:07.04.2026 Saurav Date of Uploading:08.04.2026