Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 29912 (MAD)

M/s. SSR Enterprises v. The Deputy Commissioner (CT)

WP/18209/2026 · 2026-06-04

Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 18209 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 04-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY WP No. 18209 of 2026 and WMP.Nos.19562 & 19563 of 2026 M/s. SSR Enterprises Rep. by its proprietor R.Govindaraj, No. 36, Ground Floor, Parameshwaran Layouot, PN Palayam, Coimbatore 641037. ..Petitioner Vs 1. The Deputy Commissioner (CT) Coimbatore. 2. The Assistant Commissioner (ST)(FAC) P.N Palayam Assessment Circle, Coimbatore. ..Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records in the Impugned Order passed by the 1st respondent in form GST APL - 02, vide Ref No ZD330326116934G, dated 13.03.2026 and quash the same and direct the respondent to consider and re - dispose the appeal filed by the Petitioner in Form GST APL 01, dated 05.03.2026. For Petitioner: Mr. K.G.Jayasuriya For Respondents: Mr. L.Gokulraj, Government Counsel (Tax) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 18209 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 ORDER An appellate order dated 13.03.2026 rejecting the petitioner's appeal on grounds of limitation is challenged herein. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the original order was issued on 06.11.2025 and that the appeal was lodged on 05.03.2026 along with an application to condone delay. 3. Mr. L.Gokulraj, learned Government Counsel (Tax), accepts notice on behalf of both the respondents. 4. From the documents on record, it is clear that the appeal was lodged on 05.03.2026 along with an application to condone delay. Therefore, it follows that the appeal was lodged within the condonable period. Without considering the application to condone delay, the impugned order has been issued by the appellate authority. Therefore, such order is not sustainable and is set aside. As a corollary, the matter is remanded to the appellate authority for reconsideration of the application to condone delay and the connected appeal. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 18209 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 5. The writ petition is disposed of on the above terms. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 04-06-2026 Index : Yes / No Neutral Citation : Yes / No kj To 1.The Deputy Commissioner (CT) Coimbatore. 2.The Assistant Commissioner (ST)(FAC) P.N Palayam Assessment Circle, Coimbatore. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 18209 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. KJ WP No. 18209 of 2026 and WMP.Nos.19562 & 19563 of 2026 04-06-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis