Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2991 (UTT)

MADARSA JAMIYA TUL BALAG v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPMS/670/2026 · 2026-03-20

Pankaj Purohit

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:UHC:1952 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPMS No.670 of 2026 Madarsa Jamiya Tul Balag ……….Petitioner Vs. State of Uttarakhand and others ……….Respondents Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Faizan Ali, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. Mohd. Safdar, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Mr. Suyash Pant, S.C. for the State. 3. This writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, whereby the petitioner has sought a writ of mandamus to permanently unseal the premises of the petitioner’s Madarsa-Jamiya Tul Balag situated at Siddiqui Basti, Post Office-Sahaspur, Tehsil-Vikasnagar, District-Dehradun on his giving an undertaking to the respondent-Authority that in future petitioner will not operate Madarsa in-question without due recognition by the State under the rules and regulations. 4. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that his case is covered by the judgment and order of the Co-ordinate Bench dated 26.08.2025 in WPMS No.835 of 2025, Madarsa Inamul Ulum Society Vs. State of Uttarakhand and others, and batch of writ petitions. 5. Learned counsel for the State does not dispute the contention made by learned counsel for the petitioner that the matter is covered by the 2026:UHC:1952 aforesaid judgment. 6. Accordingly writ petition stands disposed of in light of aforesaid judgment and order. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 20.03.2026 SK