M/S BISHAL TRADERS v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.
WPA/17375/2026 · 2026-07-23
Dinesh Kumar Sharma
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 29901 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 29901 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
D/L 11 23.07.2026 Sudipta ct.no.2 W.P.A. 17375 of 2026
M/s Bishal Traders Versus State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Rajesh Agarwal Mr. Sandip Tiwari
…for the petitioner.
Mr. Amlan Kumar Mukherjee Ms. Riya Ballav
…for the State.
1. Affidavit of service filed. Let it be taken on record.
2. Shorn of details, present writ petition has been filed for registration of E-vehicle.
3. Learned counsel for the State submits that there is no impediment in the registration of E-vehicle provided the same is in compliance of Rule 126 of the Central Motor Vehicles Rules and the battery is distinct from fuel cell battery. Learned counsel submits that the competent authority has no impediment in registration if all the requisite conditions are fulfilled.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner, therefore, seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to make a representation before the competent authority for
consideration in accordance with law.
2
5. Learned counsel for the State undertakes to consider the same expeditiously.
6. Let the petitioner make a representation.
7. The State shall consider the same expeditiously preferably within four weeks after giving the parties an opportunity of being heard.
8. With the above discussions made hereinabove, the present petition stands
disposed of.
(Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J.)