Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2988 (KAR)

SMT CHIKKAMMA v. SMT B R MEENA

CRL.RP/850/2017 · 2026-04-10

V Srishananda

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:20336 CRL.RP No. 850 of 2017 C/W CRL.RP No. 849 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.850 OF 2017 C/W CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.849 OF 2017 IN CRL.RP No.850/2017 BETWEEN: SMT CHIKKAMMA @ LAKSHMIDEVI W/O SIDDARAJU AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS R/AT NO.27, NEAR RAMAMANDIRA HALE OOUR, YARAGANAHALLI MYSORE DISTRICT PIN CODE-573 219 …PETITIONER (BY SMT.SHILPA.K FOR SRI RAJIV.R, ADVOCATES) AND: SMT B R MEENA W/O BOREGOWDA AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS R/AT NO.127, 2ND CROSS VIVEKANANDA BLOCK TEACHERS LAYOUT, YARAGANAHALLI MYSORE DISTRICT PIN CODE-573 219 …RESPONDENT (BY SMT.MEGHA SUNIL FOR SRI G.B.SHARATH GOWDA, ADVOCATES) THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 R/W 401 CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED 06.07.2017 IN CRL.A.NO.185/2016 PASSED BY THE IV ADDL. Digitally signed by R MANJUNATHA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:20336 CRL.RP No. 850 of 2017 C/W CRL.RP No. 849 of 2017 S.J., MYSURU, PARTLY ALLOWED THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED 26.08.2016 PASSED BY THE JMFC-III COURT, MYSURU IN C.C.NO.953/2015 AND CONSEQUENTLY ACQUIT THE PETITIONER. IN CRL.RP NO. 849/2017 BETWEEN: SMT CHIKKAMMA @ LAKSHMIDEVI W/O SIDDARAJU AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS R/AT NO.27, NEAR RAMAMANDIRA, HALE OOUR, YARAGANAHALLI MYSORE DISTRICT PIN CODE-573 219 ...PETITIONER (BY SMT.SHILPA.K, FOR SRI RAJIV.R, ADVOCATES) AND: SMT B R MEENA W/O BOREGOWDA R/AT NO.127, 2ND CROSS VIVEKANANDA BLOCK TEACHERS LAYOUT YARAGANAHALLI MYSORE DISTRICT PIN CODE-573219 ...RESPONDENT (BY SMT.MEGHA SUNIL FOR SRI G.B.SHARATH GOWDA, ADVOCATES) THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 R/W 401 CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED 6.7.2017 PASSED BY THE IV ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE, MYSURU IN CRL.A.NO.184/2016 PARTLY ALLOWED THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED 26.08.2016 PASSED BY THE J.M.F.C.(III COURT), MYSURU IN C.C.NO.760/2015 AND CONSEQUENTLY ACQUIT THE - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:20336 CRL.RP No. 850 of 2017 C/W CRL.RP No. 849 of 2017 PETITIONER. THESE PETITIONS, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER Parties are present before the Court and filed joint memo signed by them and their respective Advocates. 2. Contents of the joint memo reads as under: “The petitioner and respondent jointly submit that the above revision petitions are filed assailing the judgment rendered in Crl.A.No.184/2016 and Crl.A.No.185/2016 both on the file of IV Addl. District and Sessions Judge at Mysore. During the pendency of the revision petitions, the parties at the intervention of their friends and their respective counsels have resolved to amicably settle their dispute on the following terms: a. The petitioner has is deposited a sum of Rs.1,84,000/- in the above cases, which shall be withdrawn by the Respondent. The petitioner has no objection for the same. b. In addition to the above amount the petitioner shall pay a sum of Rs.2,16,000/- on or before 10th May 2026. c. The respondent has agreed to receive a sum of Rs.4,00,000/- stated supra in full and final - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:20336 CRL.RP No. 850 of 2017 C/W CRL.RP No. 849 of 2017 settlement of all her claims arising in these Revision Petitions. Wherefore, it is humbly prayed that this Hon’ble Court be pleased to accept this Joint Memo and dispose the above Revision Petitions in terms as stated in this joint memo to serve the interest of justice and equity.” 2. Placing the joint memo on record, both the petitions stand disposed of, 3. Amount in deposit is ordered to be withdrawn by the complainant under due identification if not already withdrawn. 4. It is made clear that if there is any default in any one of the instalments in paying the agreed compensation amount, petitioner shall undergo imprisonment as ordered by learned Trial Magistrate, confirmed by the First Appellate Court. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE MR List No.: 2 Sl No.: 80