Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010320402022 NC: 2026:KHC:36992 WP No. 14334 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.14334 OF 2022 (KLR-RES)
BETWEEN:
1. SIDDAPPA S/O CHIKKAPILLAPPA SINCE DECEASED REP. BY LRS. SREE RAMAPPA S/O LATE SIDDAPPA AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS. 2. KANTHAMMA D/O LATE SIDDAPPA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS. 3. PILLAPPA S/O LATE SIDDAPPA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS. 4. BHAGYAMMA D/O LATE SIDDAPPA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS. 5. RAMU S/O LATE SIDDAPPA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS. ALL ARE RESIDING AT MARASANDRA VILLAGE, BETHAMANGALA HOBLI-563116,
Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010320402022 NC: 2026:KHC:36992 WP No. 14334 of 2022
BANGARPET TALUK, KOLAR DISRICT. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. P.C. SUNITHA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER KOLAR DISTRICT KOLAR-563101. 2. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER KOLAR SUB DIVISION KOLAR-563101. 3. THE ASSISTANT TAHSILDAR NADAKACHERI BETHAMANGALA BANGARPET TALUK-563114. 4. JAYAPPA S/O VENKATARAMA BOVI SINCE DECEASED REP. BY LRS. 4(a). SMT. PRAMILAMMA D/O JAYAPPA R/AT YALAGONDAHALLI VILLAGE AVANI HOBLI MULBAGAL TALUK KOLAR DISTRICT KARNATAKA. 4(b). SRI. VENKATESHAPPA S/O JAYAPPA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS R/AT MARASANDRA VILLAGE, GUTTAHALLI POST
- 3 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010320402022 NC: 2026:KHC:36992 WP No. 14334 of 2022
BETHAMANGALA HOBLI KOLAR GOLD FIELDS TALUK KOLAR DISTRICT KARNATAKA. 4(c). SRI. SRIRAMAPPA S/O JAYAPPA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS R/AT MARASANDRA VILLAGE, GUTTAHALLI POST BETHAMANGALA HOBLI KOLAR GOLD FIELDS TALUK KOLAR DISTRICT KARNATAKA. 4(d). SMT. AMARAMMA D/O JAYAPPA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS R/AT KAVVAMPALY VILLAGE PANDYALAMADUGU POST RAMAKUPAM POST OFFICE CHITTOR DISTRICT ANDHRAPRADESH. 4(e). SRI. SUBRAMANI S/O JAYAPPA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS R/AT MARASANDRA VILLAGE, GUTTAHALLI POST BETHAMANGALA HOBLI KOLAR GOLD FIELDS TALUK KOLAR DISTRICT KARNATAKA. 4(f). SRI. PRAKAHA S/O JAYAPPA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS R/AT MARASANDRA VILLAGE, GUTTAHALLI POST BETHAMANGALA HOBLI
- 4 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010320402022 NC: 2026:KHC:36992 WP No. 14334 of 2022
KOLAR GOLD FIELDS TALUK KOLAR DISTRICT KARNATAKA. 4(g). SRI. SATHYANARAYANA S/O JAYAPPA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS R/AT SATHYANARAYANA BUILDING THIRUPALAYA OPP. GOVERNMENT HOSPITAL THIRUPALAYA, BOMMASANDRA INDUSTRIAL ESTATE BENGALURU KARNATAKA. 4(h). SRI. MANJUNATHA S/O JAYAPPA AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS R/AT SATHYANARAYANA BUILDING THIRUPALAYA OPP. GOVERNMENT HOSPITAL THIRUPALAYA, BOMMASANDRA INDUSTRIAL ESTATE BENGALURU KARNATAKA. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SPOORTHY HEGDE N., HCGP FOR R1 TO R3; SMT.
VAISHALI HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR LRS OF R4)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDERS PASSED BY THE RESPONDENTS NO.1 TO
3. THE ORDER OF RESPONDENT NO.2 - THE ASSISTANT, COMMISSIONER IN CASE NO.RA.NO.276/2011-12 DATED
- 5 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010320402022 NC: 2026:KHC:36992 WP No. 14334 of 2022
02.09.2014 UNDER ANNEXURE-H, AND THE ORDER PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.3 - TAHSILDAR IN CASE NO.RRT (DS) CR 36/2014-15 DATED 03.02.2015 UNDER ANNEXURE-J AND THE ORDER PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 - DEPUTY COMMISSIONER IN CASE NO.R.A.NO.72/2014-15 DATED 07.08.2019 UNDER ANNEXURE-L RESPECTIVELY; AMENDMENT ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
ORAL ORDER
1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties.
2. The petitioners are assailing the
order dated 02.09.2014(Annexure-H) in R.A.No.276/2011-12 passed by respondent No.2, the order dated 03.02.2015(Annexure-J) in RRT(DS)CR 36/2014-15 passed by respondent No.3 as well as the order dated 07.08.2019(Annexure-L) in R.A.No.72/2014-15 inter alia sought for a direction to the respondents 1 to 3 to
- 6 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010320402022 NC: 2026:KHC:36992 WP No. 14334 of 2022
enter the name of the petitioners in the revenue records pertaining to the subject land in terms of the registered Sale Deed dated 09.02.1951 (Annexure-C).
3. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties and on careful consideration of the material on record, would indicate that mutation in MR.No.30/97-98 has been made as per Annexure-C and the impugned orders in RRT(DS)CR 36/2014-15 and in R.A.No.276/2011-12 have been passed in favour of private respondents herein based on the registered Sale Deed dated as well as the genealogy tree of the original of the land in question. In that view of the matter, taking into
consideration the finding recorded by the respondent - authorities, I am of the view that, no interference is called for in this Writ Petition.
4. It is also to be noted that O.S.No.485/2014 filed by the petitioners herein has been dismissed by the competent Civil Court and it is submitted by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners that Regular Appeal is filed before the competent Civil Court. In that view of the matter also, no interference is called for in this Writ Petition. However, it is
- 7 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010320402022 NC: 2026:KHC:36992 WP No. 14334 of 2022
open for the petitioners to approach the competent authority after the conclusion of the civil proceedings.
5. With the above observation, the Writ Petition is rejected.
6. Consequently, I.A.1/2025 does not survive for
consideration.
SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE
sac List No.: 1 Sl No.: 11