Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 29873 (PAT)

Nitu Tiwari @ Km. Nitu v. The State of Bihar

CWJC/12422/2026 · 2026-08-17

Ritesh Kumar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12422 of 2026 ====================================================== Nitu Tiwari @ Km. Nitu wife of Shri Rajeev Kumar, Resident of Village - Thakaraha, Bazari Tola, Ward no. 03, Post Office Thakaraha, Police Station- Thakaraha, District-West Champaran (Bettiah). ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Additional Chief Secretary, Welfare Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Director, Integrated Child Development Services, Bihar, Patna. 4. The Divisional Commissioner, Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur. 5. The District Magistrate, West Champaran, Bettiah. 6. The District Programme Officer, Integrated Child Development Services, West Champaran, Bettiah. 7. The Child Development Project Officer, Thakraha, District- West Champaran (Bettiah). 8. The Lady Supervisor, Thakaraha, District- West Champaran, Bettiah. 9. The Ward Member, Ward No. 11, Gram Panchayat Raj Thakraha, Anchal- Thakaraha, District- West Champan, Bettiah. 10. Reena Devi, wife of Munna Mahto, Resident of village -Ali Tola, Post Office- Thakaraha, Police Station- Thakaraha, District - West Champaran (Bettiah). At present posted and working as Aanganwadi Sevika in Ward No. 11, Centre No. 20, Thakaraha, District -West Champaran, Bettiah. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Umesh Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the State : Mr. Vivek Prasad, G.P. 7 Ms. Manisha Singh, A.C. to G.P. 7 Ms. Mita Kumari, Assisting G.P. 7 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RITESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2 17-08-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. 2. After some argument, the learned counsel for the petitioner, considering his difficulty, in view of the order dated 09.04.2026 passed in LPA No. 695 of 2023 (Ram Dulari Devi Patna High Court CWJC No.12422 of 2026(2) dt.17-08-2026 2/2 & Vs. State of Bihar & Ors.) submits that he be permitted to withdraw the writ petition to approach before the authorities concerned, for ventilating his grievance, in accordance with law. 3. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the permission so sought for is accorded. 4. The writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty so sought for, to approach before the concerned authorities, in accordance with law. Rupa/- (Ritesh Kumar, J) U