CWP-18522-2026 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 114 CWP-18522-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 16.07.2026 Sunder Singh and others ....Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR Present: Mr. Vikram Sheoran, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Rahul Dev Singh, Addl. A.G., Haryana. HARPREET SINGH BRAR J. (Oral) 1. Prayer in this writ petition filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, is for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus, directing the respondents to regularize the services of the petitioner in view of the judgment rendered by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Jaggo vs Union of India, 2024 INSC 1034 and the judgment passed by this Court in CWP-31304-2025, titled as Joginder vs State of Haryana and others, decided on 31.12.2025 and to further pay the consequential benefits to the petitioner from the due date. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners, at the outset, submits that he would be satisfied if the instant writ petition of the petitioners is treated as a comprehensive representation and the same be decided by respondent No.2 by passing a speaking order in a time bound manner. MOHD YAKUB 2026.07.16 14:52 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court, Chandigarh. CWP-18522-2026 2 3. Learned State counsel, appearing on advance notice, submits that he has no objection, in case a direction is issued to respondent No.2 for time-bound consideration and decision thereof by passing a speaking order. 4. Therefore, in view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners, the respondent No.2 is directed to treat this writ petition as a comprehensive representation and consider the case of the petitioners and pass a speaking order in the light of Jaggo’s case (supra) (Annexure P-1) and the judgment passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.1996 of 2024, titled as Madan Singh and others vs State of Haryana and others, decided on 16.04.2026 (Annexure P-3), after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners, within a period of 03 months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Further, the decision taken thereof shall be conveyed to the petitioners. Needless to say, if the petitioners are found entitled to the relief sought, the same shall be granted forthwith by respondent No.2. 5. Disposed of, accordingly. (HARPREET SINGH BRAR) JUDGE 16.07.2026 yakub Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No MOHD YAKUB 2026.07.16 14:52 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court, Chandigarh.