IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT Jarnail Singh State of Punjab & CORAM: Present: NAMIT KUMAR, J. 1. Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of quashing the impugned audit report containing salient feature No.1; issued by respondent No. (Annexure P Cooperative Bank, signatures of the petitioner. 2. has already attained the age of 60 years on paid his salary etc. and, therefore, the i infructuous. 3. 15.07.2026 Vimal IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Singh Versus State of Punjab & others HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR Mr. Manbir Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Akhil Kamra, AAG, Punjab. Mr. Naginder Singh Vashist, Advocate, for respondent No.8. NAMIT KUMAR, J. (Oral) The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of quashing the impugned audit report for the year 2021 containing salient feature No.1; order dated issued by respondent No.3 and consequent order dated 13.12.2022 (Annexure P-12) issued by respondent No.2 directing the Branch Manager, Cooperative Bank, Branch Rakhra, not to allow any transaction under the signatures of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has already attained the age of 60 years on 31.01.2024 and had already been paid his salary etc. and, therefore, the instant petition has been rendered Disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether reportable: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-29578-2022 (O&M) Date of Decision: 15.07.2026 ...Petitioner ...Respondents NAMIT KUMAR Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Akhil Kamra, AAG, Punjab. Mr. Naginder Singh Vashist, Advocate, for respondent No.8. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of certiorari for the year 2021-22 (Annexure P-10) dated 09.12.2022 (Annexure P-11) 3 and consequent order dated 13.12.2022 12) issued by respondent No.2 directing the Branch Manager, not to allow any transaction under the Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner 31.01.2024 and had already been nstant petition has been rendered Disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. (NAMIT KUMAR) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under certiorari 10) 11) 3 and consequent order dated 13.12.2022 12) issued by respondent No.2 directing the Branch Manager, not to allow any transaction under the Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner 31.01.2024 and had already been nstant petition has been rendered VIMAL KUMAR 2026.07.16 17:47 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.