Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2983 (JHR)

MANJARUL SEKH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./12022/2025 · 2026-04-07

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:9840] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.12022 of 2025 ------ Manjarul Sekh, aged about 25 years Son of Sahjamal Shekh, Resident of Village- Kitajhor, P.O. Pakur, P.S. Pakur (T), District- Pakur. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Gautam Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Anup Pawan Topno, Addl.P.P. ------ Order No:-02 Dated:-07-04-2026 Heard the parties. Learned counsel for the petitioner files the supplementary affidavit. Keep the same in the record. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with S.T. Case No. 205 of 2025 arising out of Hiranpur P.S. Case No. 56 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 309(4) of B.N.S., 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner committed robbery and looted a bag of the informant containing Rs.6,45,000/-. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that without putting the petitioner under TIP, charge sheet has been submitted in this case against the petitioner as mentioned in para-8 of the bail application. It is then submitted that the petitioner is not named in the FIR. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 29.08.2025 as mentioned in para-1 of the instant bail application. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Pakur in connection with S.T. Case No. 205 of 2025 arising out of Hiranpur P.S. Case No. 56 of 2025 with the condition that he will co- operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 07.04.2026 Saroj/