23.7.2026 14 sb CRR 2885 of 2026 Uttam Sk. @ Imtiaz Ali Vs. The State of West Bengal Mr. Imtiaz Ahmed Ms. Ghazala Firdaus Mr. Sk. Saidullah Mr. Mithun Mondal Mr. Md. Arsalan …for the Petitioner The petitioner herein is aggrieved by the order dated 30.12.2025 by which, the court below had issued warrant of arrest against the present petitioner. Being aggrieved by the aforesaid order, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the entire proceeding is pending for disposal for about six years. Learned court below while passing the impugned order, did not bother to go through the entire record, which reveals that there had been no intentional laches on the part of the petitioner for completion of the trial. The order impugned is also a non-speaking order, which is not sustainable in the eye of law. However, learned counsel for the petitioner on instruction submits that the petitioner wants to surrender before the court below and as such, a liberty may be given to the petitioner. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and that the prayer made by the petitioner is innocuous, the service of copy of the application upon the opposite party is hereby dispensed with. 2 In view of above, CRR 2885 of 2026 is hereby disposed of by giving liberty to the petitioner to surrender before the court below within a period of two weeks and in the event of such surrender, the court below will dispose of his prayer in accordance with law without being influenced by any observations made herein. The impugned order dated 30.12.2025 is hereby stayed for a period of three weeks or till the petitioner surrenders before the court below, whichever is earlier. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Dr. Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee, J.)