-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH *** 120 Date of Decision: 15.07.2026 1. RFA-970-2023 (O&M) RAKESH AND OTHERS …Appellants Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS …Respondents And Sr. No. Case No. Appellant(s) Respondent(s) 2. RFA-1031-2023 (O&M) KAMLA ALIAS BIMLA DEVI AND OTHERS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS 3. RFA-52-2023 (O&M) MURTI STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS 4. RFA-360-2025 (O&M) RAM KANWAR STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present:- Mr. Ketan Antil, Advocate for appellants Mr. Arun Singhal, Advocate for appellant (in RFA-52-2023) Mr. Abhinash Jain, Additional Advocate General, Haryana Mr. Pritam Singh Saini, Advocate with Ms. Surbhi Rana, Advocate for respondent-HSIIDC *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1. As common issues are involved in the captioned appeals, with the consent of both sides, the same are hereby disposed of by this common SUDEEPAK KUMAR 2026.07.15 18:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document -2- order. For the sake of brevity and convenience, facts are borrowed from RFA-970-2023. 2. Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that delay in filing any appeal which is part of present bunch may be condoned. Accordingly, delay, if any, in any case, stands condoned. 3. Learned counsel for parties are ad idem that instant appeals may be disposed of in terms of order dated 06.07.2026 passed by this Court in RFA-1391-2022. 4. In the wake of statement of both sides, instant appeals of landowners stand dismissed in terms of RFA-1391-2022. 5. Pending Misc. application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 15.07.2026 SDK Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No SUDEEPAK KUMAR 2026.07.15 18:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document