Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 29825 (MAD)

Mageshkumar v. The State Represented by The Sub Inspector of Police

CRL OP/13894/2026 · 2026-06-04

C Kumarappan

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL OP No. 13894 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 04-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN CRL OP No. 13894 of 2026 Mageshkumar ..Petitioner(s) Vs The State Represented by The Sub Inspector of Police K-1, Town Police Station, Cheyyar, Tiruvannamalai. Crime No.75/2026 ..Respondent(s) PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, pleased to enlarge the petitioner/accused-2 on bail in Crime No.75/2026 dated 05-03-2026 pending on the file of respondent police. For Petitioner(s): Mr.K.Uthayanithi For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Yogaraja Sekar Government Advocate (Criminal side) ORDER The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 13.05.2026 for the alleged offences under Sections 309 (4) and 311 of BNS, in Crime No.75 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail. 2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner snatched gold chain of the defacto-complainant weighing 5 sovereign. Hence the case. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 13894 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has been in custody since 13.05.2026. He further submitted that he is ready to abide by any stringent condition that may be imposed by this Court and ready to co-operate for investigation. Hence, he prays to grant bail to the petitioner. 4.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution case and strongly opposed the bail application on the ground that still recovery is yet to be effected, as only a part of the gold jewelry has been recovered and A1 is still absconding. 5.From the submission of the learned Government Advocate, it is clear that A1 is absconding and the investigation is in its preliminary stage. Hence, this Court is of the firm view that it is premature to consider this bail application. Consequently, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 04-06-2026 ep https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 13894 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 To 1.The Sub Inspector of Police K-1, Town Police Station, Cheyyar, Tiruvannamalai. 2.The Public Prosecutor High Court of Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 13894 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 C.KUMARAPPAN, J. EP CRL OP No. 13894 of 2026 04-06-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis