233 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-36325-2026 Date of Decision:13.07.2026 Abdul Khan @ Abdul Hussain and Anr. …Petitioners Vs. State of Punjab …Respondent Coram : Hon’ble Mr. Justice N.S.Shekhawat Present : Ms. Gagandeep Kaur, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Sartaj Singh Gill, Sr. DAG, Punjab. *** N.S.Shekhawat J. (Oral) 1. The petitioners have filed the present petition under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 with a prayer to grant regular bail to them in case FIR No.152, dated 22.05.2026, registered under Sections 109, 118(1), 115(2), 351(2), 126(2), 304, 191(3), 190 of B.N.S,{corresponding Sections 307, 324, 323, 506, 341,148 and 149 of IPC}, (Section 304 of B.N.S added later on), Police Station Sadar Dhuri, District Sangrur, Punjab. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that from a perusal of the F.I.R (Annexure P-1), it is evident that no specific injury has been attributed to the petitioners. Even, general allegations have been levelled against the petitioners and other accused. Further, all the injuries suffered by the injured in the present case have been declared to be simple in nature and the offence under Section 109 of B.N.S was added only to make the offence graver. Even, in the present case, the investigation is almost complete and the challan is likely to be presented shortly. He further submits that even otherwise, there were only HITESH 2026.07.14 16:03 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/judgment High Court, Chandigarh temperamental differences between both the sides and now, all dispute have amicably resolved. 3. On the other hand, learned State counsel has vehemently opposed the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners on the ground that serious allegations have been levelled against the present petitioners and the present petition deserves to be dismissed by this Court. 4. Mr. Navdeep Singh, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of complainant by filing his Vakalatnama, which is taken on record and submits that he has no objection in case the present petition is allowed. 5. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the record carefully. 6. It is not in dispute that the injuries suffered by the injured in the present case are simple in nature and the injured already stands discharged from the hospital. Apart from that, the petitioners are in custody for the about 01 month and 20 days and parties have amicably resolved all their disputes. Thus, further custody of the petitioners will not serve any meaningful purpose. 7. Without commenting on the merits of the case, the present petition is allowed. The petitioners are ordered to be released on bail, on furnishing their bail bonds and surety to the satisfaction of the concerned trial Court/ Duty Magistrate/Chief Judicial Magistrate. (N.S.SHEKHAWAT) 13.07.2026 JUDGE hitesh Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No HITESH 2026.07.14 16:03 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/judgment High Court, Chandigarh