- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:34355 WP No. 6384 of 2015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.6384 OF 2015 (KLR-RR/SUR) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. PALAIAH S/O DHARANAPPA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS RESIDING AT CHIKKAGONIGERE VILLAGE, HONNALLI TALUK DAVANAGERE DISTRICT - 577 217. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. MANJUNATHA V. RAYAPPA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER DAVANAGERE DISTRICT DAVANAGERE - 577 217. 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER DAVANAGERE DISTRICT DAVANAGERE - 577 217. 3. THE SIRATEDAR HONNALLI TALUK HONNALLI - 577 217. 4. SRI. KOTTAPPA S/O THULAJAPA HADADI, MAJOR IN AGE. Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:34355 WP No. 6384 of 2015 5. SMT. BHAVANINAMMA W/O VASAPPAHADDI MAJOR IN AGE. 6. SRI. NARAYANAPPA W/O VASAPPA HADDI MAJOR IN AGE. RESIDING AT 7. SRI. AJJAPPA S/O VASAPPA HADDI MAJOR IN AGE. 8. SRI. SHIVU S/O VASAPPA HADDI MAJOR IN AGE. 9. SMT. MANJULA D/O VASAPPA HADDI MAJOR IN AGE. 10. SMT PARAVATHI D/O VASAPPA HADDI MAJOR IN AGE. 11. SMT. SHANTHAMMA W/O SHANKARAPPA HADADI MAJOR IN AGE. 12. SMT. SARASWATHAMMA W/O SHANKARAPPA MAJOR IN AGE. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:34355 WP No. 6384 of 2015 RESPONDENTS NO. 4 TO 12 ARE RESIDING AT RATTIHALLI VILLAGE HIREKERUR TALUK HAVERI DISTRICT-581 111. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SPOORTHY HEGDE N., HCGP FOR R1 TO R3; SRI. V.B. SIDDARAMAIAH, ADVOCATE FOR R6 TO R12; V/O DATED 15.01.2025 PETITION IS DISMISSED AS ABATED AGAINST R5) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER VIDE ANNEXURE-A PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 DATED 16.01.2015 IN CASE NO.RA/CR-21/2012-13. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER 1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. 2. The petitioner in this Writ Petition is assailing the order dated 16.01.2015 in case No.RA/CR-21/2012-13(Annexure-A), passed by the respondent No.1 herein. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:34355 WP No. 6384 of 2015 3. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties and taking into consideration the averments in the Writ Petition would indicate that the mutation has been changed pursuant to the registered Sale Deed dated 16.06.1959. It is to be noted that the suit which is filed by the petitioner herein in O.S.No.139/2010, came to be dismissed by the competent Civil Court. 4. In that view of the matter, I am of the view that, no interference is called for in this Writ Petition. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE sac List No.: 1 Sl No.: 3