CWP-16295-202 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 115 DAKSYA ACADEMY PRIVATE LIMITED HARYANA STATE INDUSTRIAL AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present:- Mr. Uday Gupta Mr. Unmukt Gera, Advocate Mr. Sahil Matharoo, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Deepak Bhardwaj, Advocate for respondent no.1. Mr. Mandeep Singh, Advocate for respondent no.2. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA The petition has been filed certiorari setting aside the communication dated issued by the first respondent Development Corporation Limited ₹2,51,02,156 respondent - Apparel Made (AMH SSC). 2. Apparently, of about four years 2026 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP Date of Decision: DAKSYA ACADEMY PRIVATE LIMITED Versus HARYANA STATE INDUSTRIAL AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Mr. Uday Gupta, Senior Advocate Mr. Unmukt Gera, Advocate, Ms. Neha Matharoo, Advocate Mr. Sahil Matharoo, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Deepak Bhardwaj, Advocate for respondent no.1. Mr. Mandeep Singh, Advocate for respondent no.2. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (Oral) The petition has been filed, setting aside the communication dated issued by the first respondent - Haryana State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited (HSIIDC) along with interest has been ordered against the second Apparel Made-Ups and Home Furnishing Sector Skill Council Apparently, the petitioner has approached this Court of about four years from the date of issuance of the recovery notice. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-16295-2026 Date of Decision: 08.07.2026 DAKSYA ACADEMY PRIVATE LIMITED …Petitioner(s) HARYANA STATE INDUSTRIAL AND INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED AND OTHERS …Respondent(s) TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA , Senior Advocate with Ms. Neha Matharoo, Advocate and Mr. Deepak Bhardwaj, Advocate , inter alia, seeking a writ of setting aside the communication dated 12.08.2022, Annexure P-27, State Industrial and Infrastructure (HSIIDC), whereby recovery of along with interest has been ordered against the second Ups and Home Furnishing Sector Skill Council the petitioner has approached this Court after a delay from the date of issuance of the recovery notice. Besides, HARYANA STATE INDUSTRIAL AND INFRASTRUCTURE and of 27, State Industrial and Infrastructure whereby recovery of along with interest has been ordered against the second Ups and Home Furnishing Sector Skill Council delay Besides, AMAN DUA 2026.07.15 09:34 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this judicial document CWP-16295-202 the said notice has been petitioner. 3. Learned counsel for the Corporation Shailesh Dutt, far no action has been initiated against the petitioner. 4. Faced with the situation remaining prayers in the petition may be granted, i.e., mandamus directing payable to the petitioner with the scheme framework And also issue skill certificate who have successfully completed training and cleared the assessment process. 5. Heard. 6. It is apparent on record that the (MOU) was [HSIIDC and AMH S herein entered into a separate agreement with the second respondent 27.10.2017, Annexure P terms of the MOU dated 23.10.2017, the first respondent to the second respondent. This has been specifically provided under clause 3 3. 2026 -2- the said notice has been issued to the second respondent and not to the Learned counsel for the Corporation Shailesh Dutt, Assistant General Manager of the Corporation no action has been initiated against the petitioner. Faced with the situation, learned senior counsel submits that the prayers in the petition may be granted, i.e., ecting the Corporation to process and release payable to the petitioner under the Skill Development Scheme in accordance scheme framework, uninfluenced by the impugned communication. issue skill certificates to the candidates of the petitioner’s company who have successfully completed training and cleared the assessment process. Heard. It is apparent on record that the Memorandum of Understanding was entered into between the first and HSIIDC and AMH SSC] dated 23.10.2017, Annexure P herein entered into a separate agreement with the second respondent 27.10.2017, Annexure P-2, for providing skill training to the candidates MOU dated 23.10.2017, the payments the first respondent to the second respondent. This has been specifically provided under clause 3 thereof which reads as under 3. Roles of HSIIDC a. HSIIDC will make payments to AMH SSC for project implementation as per the rates finalized for various trades under Eletronic Sector as prescribed vide common norms notification dated 15.07.2015 and 28.02.2017 (as amended time to time). issued to the second respondent and not to the Learned counsel for the Corporation, on instructions from Mr. of the Corporation, submits that so no action has been initiated against the petitioner. , learned senior counsel submits that the prayers in the petition may be granted, i.e., issuance of a writ of the Corporation to process and release payments due and under the Skill Development Scheme in accordance by the impugned communication. to the candidates of the petitioner’s company who have successfully completed training and cleared the assessment process. Memorandum of Understanding first and the second respondents Annexure P-1, and the petitioner herein entered into a separate agreement with the second respondent, dated for providing skill training to the candidates. In payments are required to be made by the first respondent to the second respondent. This has been specifically reads as under: payments to AMH SSC for project implementation as per the rates finalized for various trades under Eletronic Sector as prescribed vide common norms notification dated 15.07.2015 and 28.02.2017 (as amended issued to the second respondent and not to the Mr. so , learned senior counsel submits that the writ of due and under the Skill Development Scheme in accordance by the impugned communication. to the candidates of the petitioner’s company who have successfully completed training and cleared the assessment process. Memorandum of Understanding s and the petitioner , dated . In by the first respondent to the second respondent. This has been specifically payments to AMH SSC for project implementation as per the rates finalized for various trades under Eletronic Sector as prescribed vide common norms notification dated 15.07.2015 and 28.02.2017 (as amended AMAN DUA 2026.07.15 09:34 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this judicial document CWP-16295-202 In this view of the matter, the directions sought by the petitioner cannot be issued as it is not a party second respondent Its right to get payment, if any, for which no direction can be issued to the first respondent is not privy to the contract 7. In stands dismissed. 08.07.2026 Ad 2026 -3- b. and c. xxx xxx xxx s view of the matter, the directions sought by the petitioner cannot be is not a party to the MOU entered into between the first and second respondent whereunder no payments are to be made to the petitioner. Its right to get payment, if any, arises out of the agreement for which no direction can be issued to the first respondent is not privy to the contract. In view thereof, there is no ground to entertain the petition and it stands dismissed. Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable xxx s view of the matter, the directions sought by the petitioner cannot be to the MOU entered into between the first and the whereunder no payments are to be made to the petitioner. the agreement dated 27.10.2017, for which no direction can be issued to the first respondent - Corporation as it view thereof, there is no ground to entertain the petition and it (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No s view of the matter, the directions sought by the petitioner cannot be the whereunder no payments are to be made to the petitioner. , Corporation as it view thereof, there is no ground to entertain the petition and it ) AMAN DUA 2026.07.15 09:34 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this judicial document