SURYA PARKASH AND OTHERS v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
CRM-M/4865/2026 · 2026-07-15
Jasjit Singh Bedi
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 29810 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 29810 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
315 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-4865-2026 Date of Decision: 15.07.2026 SURYA PARKASH AND OTHERS
... Petitioner(s) Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present: Mr. Davinder Pal Soni Joura, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Mr. T.P. Singh, Sr. DAG, Haryana. **** JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J. (Oral) The prayer in this petition is for quashing of FIR No. 204 dated 22.06.2025, under Sections 351(3), 333, 191(3), 190, 117(2), 115 AND 110 of BNS, 2023, registered at Police Station Urban Estate Hisar, District Hisar and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 09.01.2026 (Annexure P-2). Vide order dated 29.01.2026 this Court had directed the parties to appear before Illaqa Magistrate for getting their statements recorded in terms of certain parameters given in the aforesaid order dated 29.01.2026 with regard to the compromise (Annexure P-2). In terms of the order dated 29.01.2026 passed by this Court, parties have appeared before the court of Additional District & Sessions Judge, Hisar and as per the report dated 24.02.2026 submitted to this Court, both the parties have got recorded their respective statements in Court. VISHAL SETHI 2026.07.16 10:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRM-M-4865-2026 -2- A perusal of the aforesaid report would show that the parties have effected a genuine compromise without there being any pressure, coercion or undue influence. In view of the compromise there is a remote possibility of the complainant coming forward to support the prosecution case. The powers under Section 482 Cr.PC can be exercised in such like situation in order to prevent unnecessary vagaries of criminal trial to be faced by the parties, when there are remote chances of conviction of the accused.The compromise in question is found to be fully in consonance with the direction issued by the Court in Kulwinder Singh & Ors. Vs. State of Punjab 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr., 2012(4) RCR (Crl.) 543.
In view of the aforesaid report of the Additional District & Sessions Judge, Hisar, accompanied by the joint statement of both the parties, the present FIR No. 204 dated 22.06.2025, under Sections 351(3), 333, 191(3), 190, 117(2), 115 AND 110 of BNS, 2023, registered at Police Station Urban Estate Hisar, District Hisar and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom are hereby quashed qua the petitioners herein. Petition stands disposed of. (JASJIT SINGH BEDI) JUDGE July 15, 2026 vishal Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether reportable:- Yes/No VISHAL SETHI 2026.07.16 10:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document