- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010277492024 NC: 2026:KHC:37826 CRL.RP No. 679 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 679 OF 2024 BETWEEN: 1. SILICON TECHNOLOGIES REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR D V ABHINANDAN AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS S/O D N VENKATARAMAYA R/A T NO 716,OPP SHAKTHI GANESHA TEMPLE,1ST B MAIN 7TH BLOCK,BANASHANKARI 3RD STAGE GIRINAGAR,BENGALURU 560 085. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. PRAVEEN C,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. M PUTTAPPA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS S/O LATE MAHIMANNA R/AT NO 20,RAMASANDRA VILLAGE SULIKERE POST,KENGERI HOBLI BENGALURU SOUTH-560 060. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. CHANDRASHEKAR REDDY K P,ADVOCATE) CRL.RP FILED U/S.397 R/W 401 CR.P.C BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING THAT THIS Digitally signed by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010277492024 NC: 2026:KHC:37826 CRL.RP No. 679 of 2024 HONOURABLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED 23.04.2024 PASSED IN CRL.A.NO.1106/2023 BY THE LEARNED LXVI ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU AND JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED 14.07.2023 PASSED BY THE XXXVI ADDL.C.M.M., BENGALURU IN C.C.NO.18/2021 FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 138 OF N.I. ACT AND TO ACQUIT THE PETITIONER. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH ORAL ORDER This matter is called twice i.e. in the early morning and also in the afternoon. But there is no representation by the revision petitioner. The matter was also referred to the mediation and the report was received that ‘not settled’. Moreover, this matter is not yet admitted and counsel for the revision petitioner is also not pursuing the matter. 2. Having perused the material also, the revision petitioner even though led evidence by examining himself as D.W.1, the defence was taken that complaint was filed through one Mr. Balraj and no financial capacity and the - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010277492024 NC: 2026:KHC:37826 CRL.RP No. 679 of 2024 same is not substantiated. The trial Court and the appellate Court taken note of the material on record and no documents are produced except the oral evidence of the revision petitioner and the same is discussed in detail in paragraph Nos.20, 21, 22 and 23, the trial court considered the material and the appellate Court also re- appreciated the same and in view of non pursuing the matter by revision petitioner, the revision petition is dismissed. 3. In view of dismissal of the main petition, pending interlocutory application if any, stands dismissed. Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE SSD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 29