1 CGHC010008612016 2026:CGHC:32627 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2104 of 2016 • Rekhraj Chandrakar S/o Shri Pawan Kumar Chandrakar, Aged About 39 Years R/o New Medical Store, Kasaridih, Kanhaiyapara, Durg, Tah. And Distt. Durg, Civil And Revenue Distt. Durg Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarh --- Petitioner(s) versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Technical Education Department, Mahanadi Bhavan, Mantralay, New Raipur Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarh 2. Director, Technical Education Department, Indrawati Bhavan, New Raipur, Distt. Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3. Chhattisgarh Public Service Commissioner Through Secretary, Raipur, Distt. Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4. Vinay Kumar Mishra, Lecturer, Modern Office Management, Goernment Girls Polytechnic, Jagdalpur, Distt. Bastar, Chhattisgarh, District : Bastar(Jagdalpur), Chhattisgarh --- Respondent(s) WPS No. 2105 of 2016 • Chhanni Sahu D/o Shri Chinta Ram Sahu, Aged About 26 Years R/o Motipur Ward No. 8, Sheetala Para, Rajnandgaon, Tah. And Distt. Rajnandgaon, Civil And Revenue Distt. Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarh ---Petitioner(s) Versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary,technical Education Department, Mahanadi Bhavan, Mantralaya, New Raipur, Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarh MANISH YADAV Digitally signed by MANISH YADAV Date: 2026.07.30 10:48:29 +0530 2 2. Director, Technical Education Department, Indrawati Bhavan, New Raipur, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3. Chhattisgarh Public Service Commissioner Through Secretary, Raipur, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4. Kajal Parganiha, Lecturer, Modern Office Management, Goovernment Girls Polytechnic, Durg, Distt. Durg, Chhattisgarh, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh --- Respondent(s) WPS No. 2106 of 2016 • Vandana Yadav D/o Shri Heera Singh Yadav, Aged About 22 Years R/o C/o Heera Singh Yadav, Govt. Polytechnic Durg, Tah. And Distt. Durg, Civil And Revenue District Durg, Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarh ---Petitioner(s) Versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary,technical Education Department, Mahanadi Bhavan, Mantralaya, New Raipur, Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarh 2. Director, Technical Education Department, Indrawati Bhavan, New Raipur, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3. Chhattisgarh Public Service Commissioner Through Secretary, Raipur, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4. Charu Awasthi, Lecturer, Modern Office Management, Government Girls Polytechnic, Raipur, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh --- Respondent(s) WPS No. 4744 of 2018 • Chhanni Sahu D/o D/o Shri Chinta Ram Sahu Aged About 28 Years R/o Motipur Ward No. 8, Sheetala Para, Rajnandgaon, Tahsil And District Rajnandgaon, Civil And Revenue District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh ---Petitioner(s) Versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Technical Education Department, Mahanadi Bhavan, Mantralaya, New Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2. Director, Technical Education Department, Indrawati Bhavan, New Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 3. Chhattisgarh Public Service Commissioner, Through Secretary, Shankar Nagar Road, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4. Shri Bhuneshwar Prasad S/o S/o Shri Bhagela Ram Aged About 29 Years Presently Posted In Govt. Polytechnic, Durg, District Durg, Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh --- Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) in WP(S) No. 2104/2016 and 2106/2016 : Mr. Manoj Sinha, Advocate For Petitioner(s) in WP(S) No. 2105/2016 and 4744/2018 : Mr. Vivek Kumar Agrawal, Advocate For Respondent(S) : Mr. Gary Mukhopadhyay, Advocate, Mr. Yash Mishra, Advocate on behalf of Dr. Sudeep Agrawal, Advocate, Mr. Prakshay Shrivastava, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Mayank Chandrakar, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board 29.07.2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that by efflux of time, the writ petitions become infructuous. 2. In view of the above, the writ petitions are disposed of as having become infructuous. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Manish