Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 29801 (CAL)

AJMIR SK @ ASMIR SK v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM(M)/1464/2026 · 2026-07-23

Tirthankar Ghosh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 D/L 270 23.07.2026 Rohit, A.R.(Ct.) ct.no.35 Allowed IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE C.R.M (M) 1464 of 2026 Ajmir Sk @ Asmir Sk Vs The State of West Bengal In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/ Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Dhubulia Police Station Case No. 137 of 2025 dated 26.03.2024 under Sections 498(A)/302/34 of the Indian Penal Code And In the matter of : Ajmir Sk @ Asmir Sk ……Petitioner. Mr. Sumanta Das …for the Petitioner Mr. Krishnendu Bhattacharya, Ld. APP Ms. Tanusree Kar …for the State 1. Learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner is in custody for two years four months and out of 22 witnesses 7 witnesses have been examined. There is no scope for the trial being taken to its logical conclusion. As such petitioner prays for bail. 2. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposes the prayer for bail as it is the husband who assaulted the wife to death. 3. Records reflects that marriage was solemnized 28 years prior to the date of the incident and the facts which 2 are reflecting from the material would reflect trappings of certain provocation. 4. Having considered the overall circumstances and without entering into the merits of the case I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. 5. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed. The petitioner, namely, Ajmir Sk @ Asmir Sk shall be released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand Only) with two sureties of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each, one of whom must be local to the satisfaction of Learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Krishnagar. 6. If on bail, the petitioner shall be physically present on each and every date before the learned Trial Court and shall not leave the district of Nadia without prior permission of the learned Trial Court. 7. With the aforesaid observation, C.R.M (M) 1464 of 2026 is allowed. 8. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the Official website of this Court. 9. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)