SADHUCHARAN SOMRUI ALIAS SADHUCHARAN SUMBRUI ALIAS SUMBRUI ALIAS DIKU, v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./11880/2025 · 2026-04-07
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2980 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2980 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:JHHC:9841] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.11880 of 2025
------ Sadhucharan Somrui @ Sadhucharan Sumbrui @ Diku, aged about 32 years, son of Ram Somrui, resident of Somra, Police Station Chakradharpur, Post Office Toklo, District West Singhbhum. .... .... …. Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Vikash Kumar, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Addl.P.P.
------
Order No:-04 Dated:-07-04-2026
Heard the parties.
The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Kharsawan P.S. Case No. 30 of 2025 (S) registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 115(2), 308(2), 351(2), 351(3), 352, 3(5) of B.N.S., 2023 and Section 17 of the CLA Act.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was a member of an unlawful assembly and in prosecution of common object of the assembly, committed extortion. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that the petitioner is not named in the FIR and without putting him under T.I.P., charge sheet has been submitted against the petitioner. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 23.11.2025 as mentioned in para-14 of the instant bail application. It is further submitted that the co-accused, with similar allegations, has already been admitted to bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 31.07.2025 passed B.A. No. 6307 of 2025. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned counsel appearing for the State submits that the petitioner has two criminal antecedents and opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is
directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Seraikella in connection with Kharsawan P.S. Case No. 30 of 2025 (S) with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 07.04.2026 Saroj/