IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32239 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-486 Year-2025 Thana- LAKHISARAI District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== 1. Raj Kumar Yadav Son of Umesh Yadav @ Mato Yadav Resident of Village- Garhi Bishanpur, P.S.- Lakhisarai, District- Lakhisarai 2. Mohit Kumar @ Bhulla @ Bhulla Yadav Son of Umesh Yadav @ Mato Yadav Resident of Village- Garhi Bishanpur, P.S.- Lakhisarai, District- Lakhisarai ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manohar Prasad Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Upendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 4 17-08-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State. 2. The present petition has been filed on behalf of the petitioners under Section 482 of the B.N.S.S. for anticipatory bail apprehending their arrest, in connection with Lakhisarai P.S. Case No. 486 of 2025 dated 20.10.2025, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 115(2), 126(2), 303(2), 109, 352 and 351(2) of B.N.S., 2023. Similar application filed by the petitioners has been rejected by learned Court of Sessions vide order dated 26.02.2026, passed in A.B.P. No. 168 of 2026. 3. As per allegation, when the informant was coming Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32239 of 2026(4) dt.17-08-2026 2/3 to his home from a local shop, the petitioners and other co- accused assaulted him by lathi, danda, rod and khanti, causing injury on his person. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the petitioners’ side and the informant’s side are next door neighbors and there is dispute regarding raasta between them and hence, altercation took place in which both sides got injuries and case and counter case have been filed. The counter case filed by the petitioners’ side bears Lakhisarai P.S. Case No. 487 of 2025. He also submits that the injury allegedly caused by the petitioners and other co-accused is simple in nature as per the injury report. 5. It is also stated in paragraph no. 2 of the bail petition that the petitioners have not moved this Court earlier either for anticipatory bail or regular one in the instant case. 6. It has further been stated in paragraph no.3 of the petition that the petitioner No. 1 has four criminal antecedents, whereas petitioner No. 2 has three criminal antecedents. 7. Learned APP for the State vehemently opposes the prayer of the petitioners for bail. 8. Considering the case and counter case and simple Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32239 of 2026(4) dt.17-08-2026 3/3 nature of the alleged injury, this petition is allowed, directing the petitioners above-named, to be enlarged on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt / production of a copy of this order, on their furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000 /- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned concerned Court below, in connection with Lakhisarai P.S. Case No. 486 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the B.N.S.S., 2023 and on the following conditions: (i) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court below that the petitioners have any criminal antecedents other than the disclosed one, learned court below shall cancel the bail bonds of the petitioners after hearing them and getting satisfied that the petitioners have concealed their criminal antecedents despite their knowledge of the same. (ii) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court below that statement regarding previous bail petition is wrong, learned court below shall cancel the bail bonds of the petitioners. shoaib/- (Jitendra Kumar, J) U T