CWP-20869-2026 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 125 CWP-20869-2026 Date of Decision: 13.07.2026 Dr. Gajender Singh …Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana and others …Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Present:- Mr. Mukesh Yadav, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Bhupender Singh, Additional Advocate General, Haryana TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (Oral) The petition has been filed inter alia seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to decide the petitioner’s applications dated 27.01.2022 and 30.05.2022, Annexures P-3 and P-4, seeking sanction under Section 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, to prosecute respondents no.4 and 5 in criminal complaint dated 07.07.2022, Annexure P-1, filed under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 7, 10, 11, 13(1)(d) and 15 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. 2. It is not disputed that the complaint has already been dismissed by the Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, Rewari, vide order dated 16.02.2026. Although the petitioner has challenged the order by filing a petition, CRR-1662-2026, it is pending adjudication. Accordingly, as on date, PAYAL 2026.07.16 18:24 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment CWP-20869-2026 -2- there is no complaint pending against respondents no.4 and 5 which could afford any ground to the petitioner to file a petition seeking grant of sanction to prosecute them. 3. The petition is apparently without any cause and stands dismissed. (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE 13.07.2026 Payal Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No PAYAL 2026.07.16 18:24 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment