Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 29790 (PNJ)

DALJIT SINGH DHALIWAL v. PUNJAB STATE POWER CORPORATION LTD AND OTHERS

CWP/18895/2026 · 2026-07-13

Tribhuvan Dahiya

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-18895-202 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 117 DALJIT SINGH DHALIWAL PUNJAB STATE POWER CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present:- Mr. Navjeet Singh Mr. Manan Bhardwaj, Advocate for respondent no.1 to 4. Mr. Jagdeep Singh Bajwa, Advocate for TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA The petition has been filed, respondents no.1 to 4 connection installed 2. Learned counsel for respondents no.1 to 4 has been reinstalled 3. The petition has, accordingly, stands disposed of no.12 and 13 to avail the appropriate remedy in accordance with law they have any grievance against the electric wire/supply line to the petitioner’s tubewell. 13.07.2026 Ad 2026 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP Date of Decision: DALJIT SINGH DHALIWAL Versus PUNJAB STATE POWER CORPORATION LIMITED AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Mr. Navjeet Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Manan Bhardwaj, Advocate for respondent no.1 to 4. Mr. Jagdeep Singh Bajwa, Advocate for respondents no.12 and 13. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (Oral) The petition has been filed, inter alia respondents no.1 to 4 to reinstall 11 KV HT wire installed in the petitioner’s fields. Learned counsel for respondents no.1 to 4 has been reinstalled and electricity has been restored The petition has, accordingly, been rendered infructuous disposed of as such, without prejudice to the rights of respondents to avail the appropriate remedy in accordance with law they have any grievance against the electric wire/supply line to the petitioner’s Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-18895-2026 Date of Decision: 13.07.2026 …Petitioner(s) CORPORATION LIMITED AND OTHERS …Respondent(s) TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA for the petitioner. Mr. Manan Bhardwaj, Advocate for respondent no.1 to 4. Mr. Jagdeep Singh Bajwa, Advocate inter alia, seeking a direction to HT wire to the tubewell motor Learned counsel for respondents no.1 to 4 submits that the wire restored to the tubewell. been rendered infructuous and without prejudice to the rights of respondents to avail the appropriate remedy in accordance with law in case they have any grievance against the electric wire/supply line to the petitioner’s (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No direction to motor wire and without prejudice to the rights of respondents in case they have any grievance against the electric wire/supply line to the petitioner’s ) AMAN DUA 2026.07.16 10:07 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this judicial document