Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 29790 (MAD)

Murugan Impex v. The Assistant Commissioner (ST)

WP/19089/2026 · 2026-06-08

Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 19089 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 08-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY WP No. 19089 of 2026 & WMP Nos.20347 & 20348 of 2026 Murugan Impex Represented by its Proprietor Parthiban Duraikannu No.22/43, Vembuli Subedhar Street, Alandur, Chennai 600 016 ..Petitioner(s) Vs The Assistant Commissioner (ST), Alandur Assessment Circle Room No. 352, 3 rd Floor Integrated Commercial Taxes and Registration Department (South Tower) Anna Salai, Nandanam Chennai 600035. ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of impugned order under Section 73 dated 15.02.2025 having Reference No. ZD3302251447499 passed by the respondent for the financial year 2020-21 and quash the same as illegal, erroneous on facts and violative of principles of Natural Justice and consequently direct the respondent to consider the matter afresh on merits after providing an opportunity of personal hearing. For Petitioner(s): Mr.V.Parthiban For Respondent(s): Mr.R.Sethu Prabakaran, Govt. Counsel (T) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 19089 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 ORDER The input tax credit availed of by the petitioner was rejected on the sole ground of belated filing of returns under Section 16(4) of applicable GST enactments. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the law was amended by inserting Section 16(5) re-fixing the time limits for filing returns and availing of input tax credit. On account of this development, he submits that the impugned order is not sustainable. 3. Mr.R.Sethu Prabakaran, learned Government Counsel, accepts notice for the respondent. He concurs with the legal position. 4. In view of the change in law by incorporation of Section 16(5), the rejection of the input tax credit is unsustainable. Hence, the impugned order is set aside. 5. With the above observation, this writ petition is disposed of. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. No costs. 08-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No KAL https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 19089 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 To The Assistant Commissioner (ST), Alandur Assessment Circle Room No. 352, 3 rd Floor Integrated Commercial Taxes and Registration Department (South Tower) Anna Salai, Nandanam Chennai 600035. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 19089 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. KAL WP No. 19089 of 2026 & WMP Nos.20347 & 20348 of 2026 08-06-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis