1 CGHC010289922026 2026:CGHC:32573 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRC No. 6809 of 2026 Jai Prakash Banjare @ Ajju S/o Laxman Prasad Banjare, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Village- Selud, Mazar Chowk, Police Station Utai, Tahsil and District- Durg, Chhattisgarh, ... Applicant versus State of Chhattisgarh Through- Police Station Utai, District- Durg, Chhattisgarh ... Non-Applicant For Applicant : Mr. Virendra Kashyap, Advocate. For Non-Applicant/State : Ms. Smriti Shrivastava, Panel Lawyer. Hon’ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Order on Board 29.07.2026 1. This is the first bail application filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of regular bail to the applicant who has been arrested in connection with Crime No. 272/2026 registered at Police Station - Utai, District- Durg (C.G.), for the offence punishable under Section 34(2) of the Chhattisgarh Excise Act. 2. As per the prosecution story, on 29.05.2026 at about 1:20 P.M., the police allegedly received information from an informant regarding the illegal sale of liquor near Umarpoti Talab Paar. Acting upon the said information, the police party proceeded to the spot and allegedly apprehended the applicant. The prosecution further alleges that, upon search of the applicant, 32 quarters of country-made liquor, each containing 180 ml, PREETI KUMARI Digitally signed by PREETI KUMARI Date: 2026.07.30 10:50:03 +0530 2 having a total quantity of 5.760 bulk litres and valued at approximately Rs. 3,200/-, along with the alleged sale proceeds of Rs. 200/-, were recovered from his possession. On the basis of the said alleged recovery, the applicant was taken into custody and Crime No. 272/2026 was registered against him for the offence punishable under Section 34(2) of the Chhattisgarh Excise Act. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is further submitted that the charge-sheet has already been filed in the present case and that the applicant has been in judicial custody since 29.05.2026. He further submits that the applicant has two previous criminal antecedents, one under the BNS, 2023 and the other under the Excise Act, both the cases are presently pending. Learned Counsel argues that under Section 34(2) of the C.G. Excise Act, the prescribed punishment ranges from a minimum of one year to a maximum of three years, and that the conclusion of the trial is likely to take a considerable amount of time. In light of the aforesaid circumstances, it is prayed that this Court may be pleased to grant regular bail to the applicant. 4. Learned counsel for the State/non-applicant opposes the bail application. She further submitted that the charge-sheet has been filed. She also submits that the applicant has two previous criminal antecedents, one under the BNS, 2023 and the other under the Excise Act, both the cases are presently pending, therefore the applicant is not entitled for grant of bail. 5. I have heard learned counsel appearing for the parties and perused the case diary. 3 6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, the nature and gravity of the allegations levelled against the applicant, and the fact that the charge-sheet has been filed, further the applicant has two previous criminal antecedents, one under the BNS, 2023 and the other under the Excise Act and the applicant has been in custody since 29.05.2026, and that the conclusion of the trial is likely to take some time, this Court is of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail in the present case. 7. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. Let the applicant - Jai Prakash Banjare @ Ajju, involved in Crime No. 272/2026 registered at Police Station - Utai, District- Durg (C.G.), for the offence punishable under Section 34(2) of the Chhattisgarh Excise Act, be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties in the like sum to the satisfaction of the Court concerned with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law. (ii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 269 of BNS. (iii) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence, 4 proclamation under Section 84 of BNSS is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the Court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial Court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 209 of BNS. (iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial Court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 351 of BNSS. If in the opinion of the trial Court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial Court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law. 8. Office is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the trial Court for necessary information and compliance forthwith. - Sd/-- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Preeti