Siken Risideo @ Siken Risidev v. The State of Bihar
CR. MISC./46371/2026 · 2026-08-17
Alok Kumar
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 29783 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 29783 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.46371 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-255 Year-2025 Thana- SIMRAHA District- Araria ====================================================== Siken Risideo @ Siken Risidev S/o Late Nago Risidev R/o Village -Mirjapur, Lavtolia Musahari Tola, Ward No. 09, P.S - Simraha, District - Araria ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vijay Kishore Bharti, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Mithlesh Kumar Khare, APP ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR ORAL ORDER 3 17-08-2026
Learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State are present. 2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Sessions Trial No. 411 of 2026 arising out of Simraha P.S. Case No. 255 of 2025, registered for the offences under Sections 103(1), 61(1), 238, 3 (5) of BNS, pending in the Learned Court of District and Additional Sessions Judge-II, Araria. 3. The prosecution case, in brief, is that the petitioner along with other co-accused assaulted the informant’s son which led to his death. It is further alleged that on search, the informant saw blood and a blood spotted lathi. Then the informant followed the blood spot and then found the dead body of the victim in water. It is also alleged that the victim has a prior dispute with the petitioner and other co-accused which led
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46371 of 2026(3) dt.17-08-2026 2/3 to the death of the victim. 4. The counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedents and is in judicial custody since 03.02.2026. The counsel further submits that on confessional statements of the other co-accused persons, the petitioner was arrested. 5. The Learned APP for the State vehemently opposes the prayer of regular bail to the petitioner. 6. Having heard the parties and perused the case diary and taking into consideration the fact that the petitioner has clean antecedents and the other co-accused has confessed that he has committed the alleged crime, I am inclined to grant the petitioner benefit of regular bail. Let the above named petitioner, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the likewise amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Sessions Trial No. 411 of 2026 arising out of Simraha P.S. Case No. 255 of 2025, registered for the offences under Sections 103(1), 61(1), 238, 3 (5) of BNS, subject to the following conditions: (I) One of the bailors shall be the petitioner’s own or close family member. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46371 of 2026(3) dt.17-08-2026 3/3 (II) The petitioner shall co-operate in the process of trial. (III) The petitioner shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence or influence/intimidate any witness during the course of trial. (IV) The Petitioner shall not commit an offence of a similar nature in future.
In case of violation of any of the aforesaid conditions, the Trial Court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner. Anand/- (Alok Kumar, J) U T