Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 29783 (CHH)

ANIL AGRAWAL v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/2129/2021 · 2026-07-28

Shri Parth Prateem Sahu

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010103492021 2026:CGHC:32733 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2129 of 2021 Anil Agrawal S/o Late Sukhsagar Agrawal Aged About 52 Years R/o Opposite Government School, Kushalpur, Purani Basti, Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh --- Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Principal Secretary Department Of Revenue Mahanadi Bhavan, Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - The Collector Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - The Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4 - The Tehsildar Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 5 - The Superintendent Of Police Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 6 - The Station House Officer Purani Basti, Aminpara, Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 7 - Municipal Corporation Raipur Through Its Commissioner Municipal Corporation Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 8 - Commissioner Municipal Corporation Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 9 - Zone Commissioner Zone No. 5, Municipal Corporation Idgah Bhata Ground, Opposite Rajkumar College, Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh --- Respondent(s) (Cause title is taken from CIS system) For Petitioner : Mr. Arpit Agrawal, Advocate For Respondents/State : Mr. Karan Baharani, P.L. For Respondent No. 7 to 9 : Dr. Sudeep Agrawal, Advocate BALRAM PRASAD DEWANGAN Digitally signed by BALRAM PRASAD DEWANGAN 2 Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu Order On Board 29/07/2026 1. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that at this stage he may be permitted to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to file appropriate application for demarcation before appropriate authority and thereafter to file appropriate proceedings, if any, grievance subsists thereafter. 2. In view of the above submission made by learned counsel for petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as prayed for. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Balram