SMT SUKHINDER KAUR BRAR v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CWP/20861/2026 · 2026-07-13
Tribhuvan Dahiya
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 29774 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 29774 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
124
CWP-20861-2026
Date of Decision: 13.07.2026
Sukhinder Kaur Brar
…Petitioner(s) Versus State of Punjab and others …Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA
Present:- Mr. Arjun Pratap Atma Ram, Advocate for the petitioner
Mr. Vikas Arora, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab
TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (Oral)
The petition has been filed inter alia seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to renew the registration number of the petitioner’s vehicle, which expired on 30.12.2025. The representation, dated 18.06.2026, submitted for the purpose is not being decided, nor has the registration been renewed.
2.
Learned State counsel submits that the petitioner’s representation will be decided by respondent no.4/Regional Transport Officer, Ludhiana, by passing a speaking order in accordance with law, within a period of two months.
3.
In view of the statement made, learned counsel for the petitioner has no objection to the petition being disposed of in terms thereof.
4.
Ordered accordingly.
(TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA)
JUDGE 13.07.2026 Payal Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
PAYAL 2026.07.15 10:41 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment