Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2977 (HP)

SANJAY KUMAR v. THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS

CWP/5192/2026 · 2026-04-16

Ajay Mohan Goel

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:HHC:11618 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.5192 of 2026 Decided on: 16.04.2026 Sanjay Kumar … Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 ____________________________________________________ _ For the petitioner: Mr. Ankit Dhiman, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Additional Advocate General. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of respondents. The petitioner has assailed the order, in terms whereof, his request for transfer from his present place of posting has been rejected. Learned Additional Advocate General has obtained instructions in the matter and he apprises the Court that as the petitioner has completed his normal tenure at the tribal area, his case for transfer to the non- tribal area is being submitted for approval of the Competent Authority and needful shall be done shortly. 2. In light of the instructions imparted by learned Additional Advocate General, this petition is disposed of with the direction that let needful be positively done within a period of four weeks from today. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. List for compliance on 21.05.2026. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge April 16, 2026 (Rishi) 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?