RAMIJRAJA @ RAMIJRAJA TITA v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL
CRM(M)/1463/2026 · 2026-07-23
Tirthankar Ghosh
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 29765 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 29765 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
D/L 269
23.07.2026 Rohit, A.R.(Ct.) ct.no.35 Rejected IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE
C.R.M (M) 1463 of 2026
Ramijraja @ Ramijraja Tita
Vs
The State of West Bengal
In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/ Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with G.R. Case No. 1003/2025 arising out of Cyber Crime P.S Howrah District Case No. 10/25 dated 25.04.2025 under Sections 318(2)/318(4)/319(2)/336(3)/61(2)/316(2)/317(4)/338/340(2)/35 1(2)/3(5) of BNS and 66C/66D of IT Act, 2000 And In the matter of : Ramijraja @ Ramijraja Tita
……Petitioner. Mr. Sk. Moinuddin
…for the Petitioner
Mr. Krishnendu Bhattacharya Ms. Tanusree Kar
…for the State
1. Learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner was arrested on August, 2025 and since then he is custody. Learned Advocate submits that petitioner is innocent of the charges and in unnecessarily languishing in jail.
2. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State submits that petitioner is the recipient of money at the third layer. Money claim reflects that a sum of Rs. 5,00,000/-(five lakhs) received by the petitioner initially
2
and so far as other investigations are concerned it reflects that another Rs. 24.99 lakhs have been received in account of the present petitioner.
3. Having considered the gravity of the offence and the offence which is a threat to the society along with the petitioner being in the chain in the offence of digital arrest being involved I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail.
4. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected.
5. With the aforesaid observation, C.R.M (M) 1463 of 2026 is dismissed.
6. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the Official website of this Court.
7. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)