Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 29761 (PNJ)

ROHIT ALIAS ROHIT SHARMA v. STATE OF HARYANA

CRM-M/24075/2026 · 2026-07-16

Jasjit Singh Bedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-24075-2026 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (206) CRM-M-24075-2026 (O & M) Date of decision: 16.07.2026 Rohit @ Rohit Sharma ... Petitioner V/s State of Haryana ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present: Mr. Tarun Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. T.P. Singh, Sr. DAG, Haryana. **** JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J. (Oral) The petitioner seeks the grant of anticipatory bail under Section 482 BNSS, 2023 (Section 438 Cr.P.C.) in case bearing FIR No.0113 dated 10.04.2026 under Sections 21(b) NDPS Act, 1985 later on added Sections 27-A, 29 of the NDPS Act, 1985 registered at Police Station Mahesh Nagar, District Ambala. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pursuant to the interim order dated 30.04.2026 passed by this Court, the petitioner has joined the investigation. The learned State counsel on instructions submits that the petitioner has joined the investigation in terms of the order dated 30.04.2026 and is not required for custodial interrogation. In view of the above, the interim order dated 30.04.2026 is made absolute. SUKHPREET KAUR 2026.07.16 18:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh CRM-M-24075-2026 (O & M) However, the petitioner shall keep on joining the investigation as and when required to do so and he shall abide by the conditions as envisaged under Section 482(2) BNSS. The petition stands disposed of. July 16, 2026 ( JASJIT SINGH BEDI) sukhpreet JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No SUKHPREET KAUR 2026.07.16 18:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh