- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010454422026 NC: 2026:KHC:36258 WP No. 20734 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE P SREE SUDHA WRIT PETITION NO.20734 OF 2026 (GM-FC) BETWEEN: PRASHANTHKUMAR A.D., S/O C. DODDANNACHAR, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/A #43, 5th CROSS, SAHUKAR CHANNAIAH EXTENSION, GUTHALU ROAD, MANDYA CITY - 571 403. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. BIRADAR SHIVAPPA CHANABASAPPA, ADVOCATE) AND: MOHANKUMARI @ RAKSHITHA M.N., D/O M.C. NAGENDRA PRASAD, W/O PRASHANTHKUMAR A.D., AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, R/A AT 3rd CROSS, NEAR JAI BHARATH SCHOOL, TAVAREGERE EXTENSION, MANDYA CITY - 571 403. …RESPONDENT THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED ON MEMO DATED 27.09.2025 BY THE HONBLE SENIOR Digitally signed by PADMASHREE SHEKHAR DESAI Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010454422026 NC: 2026:KHC:36258 WP No. 20734 of 2026 CIVIL COURT AND CJM, MANDYA IN M.C.NO.118/2022 VIDE ORDER ANNEXURE-D AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDER, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE P SREE SUDHA ORAL ORDER Present writ petition is filed seeking to quash the memo dated 27.09.2025 passed in MC No.118/2022 and the judgment dated 27.09.2025. 2. The office raised an objection regarding the maintainability of the writ petition on the ground that the petitioner had filed a writ petition instead of RPFC and directed him to comply with the office objections. 3. The petitioner has not complied with the office objections. Therefore, the writ petition is not maintainable. He has been directed to take appropriate steps against the said order. - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010454422026 NC: 2026:KHC:36258 WP No. 20734 of 2026 4. It is stated that the petitioner is the husband. He had filed M.C. No. 118/2022 seeking dissolution of the marriage. During the pendency of the proceedings, both parties entered into a joint memo on 27.01.2025, and based on the said joint memo, their marriage was dissolved. 5. The petitioner contends that he had filed an application for withdrawal of the petition on 28.06.2025. However, according to him, the said application was not considered, and the marriage was nevertheless dissolved by the order dated 27.09.2025. 6. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as not maintainable. Sd/- (P SREE SUDHA) JUDGE TMP List No.: 2 Sl No.: 9