Sikandar Sahani @ Sikki Sahani v. The State of Bihar
CR. MISC./26045/2026 · 2026-04-22
Sunil Dutta Mishra
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2973 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2973 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26045 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-827 Year-2025 Thana- MOTIHARI MUFASIL District- East Champaran ======================================================
1. Sikandar Sahani @ Sikki Sahani Son of Nagendra @ Rajendra Sahani @ Nagendra Sahani Resident Of Village- Madhubani Ghat Ps -Muffasil District -East Champaran
2. Lakhan Jaiswal @ Sanjeet Kumar Son of Shambhu jaiswal Resident Of Village- Madhubani Ghat Ps -Muffasil District -East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Prateek Tandon, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Umeshanand Pandit, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 2 22-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
3. As per the prosecution case, 313.845 liters illicit liquor was recovered from Gowas of co-accused Bikhar Mahato.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the present case merely on suspicion. Further submission is that petitioners were not present on the spot and
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26045 of 2026(2) dt.22-04-2026 2/2 nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioners. Petitioners have no concern with the seized liquor. Petitioners have got no criminal antecedent and they undertake to cooperate in the investigation and trial.
5. Learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioners.
6. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties and clean antecedent of the petitioners, let the above named petitioners be released on bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Excise Court No. 1, Motihari, East Champaran in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 827 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S., 2023.
utkarsh/- (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) U T