Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2973 (AP)

M/S RAVITEJ PROJECTS v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/14451/2026 · 2026-06-14

Harinath N

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010258172026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] MONDAY,THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 14451/2026 Between: 1. M/S RAVITEJ PROJECTS, REP BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, JASTI PADMAJA, W/O.SRINIVAS, AGED 54 YEARS, R/O D.NO. 11- 160/1, GADDAM RATTAIAH STREET,ASHOK NAGAR, ADJACENT TO TIME HOSPITAL VIJAYAWADA (URBAN), KRISHNA NAGAR ,ANDRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT SECRETARIAT BUILDING, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR.522238 2. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, VIJAYAWADA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION , VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT.522001 3. THE VIJAYAWADA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, REP.BY. COMMISSIONER, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT.522001 4. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, VIJAYAWADA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, VIJAYAWADA,KRISHNA DISTRICT.522001 5. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND PLANNING SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 522238 2 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in withholding the payments of pending amounts of Rs. 6,37,83,220/- ( Rupees Six Crore Thirty Seven Lakhs Eighty Three Thousand Two Hundred and Twenty only) payable to the petitioner in relation to the works i.e. Construction of Retaining walls approaches on both sides of RUB (Railway under Bridge ) and Electrification works like street lighting for RUB at Madhura nagar under EPC System Agreement No. 24 /2020-21, dt 29.08.2020,as bad .illegal, arbitrary, improper, unjust and against the Article 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to pay the amounts of Rs. 6,37,83,220/- ( Rupees Six Crore Thirty Seven Lakhs Eighty Three Thousand Two Hundred and Twenty only) with interest @ 24 percent per annum for the delayed amount - till date of realization for the works executed by the petitioner and pass any other order or orders as this Honble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case. IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to forthwith consider releasing the amounts Rs. 6,37,83,220/- ( Rupees Six Crore Thirty Seven Lakhs Eighty Three Thousand Two Hundred and Twenty only) payable to the petitioner herein, pending disposal of the writ petition and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. DEVASRI ROSHAN KANCHARLA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV 2. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING The Court made the following: 3 Order:- The petitioner has completed the work as entrusted by respondent Nos. 2 to 4. The petitioner has also submitted the final bills to the respondents. The petitioner has successfully completed construction of retaining walls, approaches on both sides of the Railway Under Bridge, and electrification works like street lighting for the Railway Under Bridge at Madhura Nagar under EPC system vide Agreement No. 24/2020-21 dated 29.08.2020. 2. It is submitted that the competent respondent authority has endorsed the quality of work completed by the petitioner and also issued a quality control certificate on 01.11.2023. The respondents are yet to release the bills due and payable to the petitioner. 3. Sri S.V.S.S. Siva Ram, learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondent Nos. 2 to 4, on written instructions submits that the petitioner has completed the work entrusted. It is also submitted that the petitioner has been paid the earlier bills submitted, and a portion of the bill was submitted by the petitioner on 28.04.2026. It is further stated in the written instructions that the amounts due and payable to the petitioner shall be cleared as soon as the budget is sanctioned by the Government. 4. Recording the submissions, this writ petition is disposed of at the admission stage, directing the respondents to verify and release the payments due and payable to the petitioner as expeditiously as possible, preferably 4 within a period of twelve (12) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 15.06.2026 PNS