23.07.2026 Item No.10 Court No.9 CHC (Rejected) Calcutta High Court In the Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri Appellate Side C.R.M. (M) 110 of 2026 In Re:- An application for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, corresponding to Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, in connection with Bhaktinagar Police Station Case No. 727 of 2025 dated 23.07.2025 under Sections 331(4)/ 305/ 324(5)/ 326(g)/61(2) of BNS. And In the matter of : Ujair Khan ...… petitioner Ms. Srishti Sarker, Advocate Ms. Bipasha Mrug, Advocate ...for the petitioner Mr. Jonardan Periwal, Jr. P.P. Mr. Gobinda Ghosh, Advocate Ms. Rajyashree Ghosh, Advocate …for the Sate 1. Prayer for bail of the petitioner is taken up for consideration. 2. It is submitted by the learned advocate for the petitioner that the petitioner is innocent having not committed any offence at all. He has been falsely implicated in the instant case. Learned advocate for the petitioner also submits that petitioner has been in custody for more than 360 days. The investigation of the case has been concluded and chargesheet has been submitted. She prays for bail of the petitioner. 2 3. Leaned advocate for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. 4. Learned advocate for the State refers to the materials in the Case Diary and submits that petitioner has been in conspiracy towards the commission of an organized crime like looting of ATM machines. He also refers to the recovery of alleged offending articles. It is submitted by learned advocate for the State that the petitioner happens to be the member of a Pan India Gang which commits organized crime. 5. Having heard the rival submissions made on behalf of the parties and on perusal of the materials in the Case Diary, it transpires that investigation of the case has already been culminated into a chargesheet under Sections 331(4)/305/324(5)/326(g)/61(2) of the BNS. 6. Considering the gravity of the offence and considering the materials in the Case Diary, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. 7. Consequently, prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected. 8. CRM(M) 110 of 2026 is dismissed. (Md. Shabbar Rashidi, J.)