Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 29711 (MAD)

P.Baskaran v. The Deputy State Tax Officer

WP/18015/2026 · 2026-06-04

Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 18015 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 04-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY WP No. 18015 of 2026 and WMP.Nos.19364 & 19367 of 2026 P.Baskaran Rep. by its Proprietor Baskaran, No.589/ Old No.217, Trichy Main Road, Gugai, Salem, Tamil Nadu- 636 006 ..Petitioner Vs The Deputy State Tax Officer, (Also known as the Deputy Commercial Tax Officer), Gugai Circle Salem, Room No.126, 1st Floor, Integrated commercial Taxes Building, No.17, Pitchards Road, Hasthampatty, Salem-7. ..Respondent Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records on the files of the learned Respondent herein in GSTIN/ 33AGXPB4930D1ZL/ 2018-19 in FORM GST DRC-07 in Order Reference No. ZD330824291608Z dated 30.08.2024 and quash the same. For Petitioner: Ms. Siri Chandana K. For Respondent: Ms. Amirta Poonkodi Dinakaran Government Counsel (Tax) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 18015 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 ORDER An order dated 30.08.2024 imposing interest and penalty under Section 74 of applicable GST enactments is challenged herein on the ground of alleged breach of principles of natural justice. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the Input Tax Credit (ITC) availed of by the petitioner was reversed although there was genuine supply of goods. She also submits that the ingredients of Section 74 are not made out. 3. Ms. Amirta Poonkodi Dinakaran, learned Government Counsel (Tax), accepts notice on behalf of the respondent. She submits that the petitioner had replied to the show cause notice and that no case is made out for interference. 4. The ITC availed of by the petitioner has been reversed. Therefore, revenue interest is protected to that extent. The possibility of the petitioner establishing that there was a genuine supply of goods and that Section 74 was incorrectly invoked cannot be ruled out without providing the petitioner an opportunity to place material documents on record. For that limited purpose, the order impugned herein is set aside and the matter is remanded for reconsideration with regard to the invocation of Section 74. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 18015 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 5. After providing a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner, a fresh order shall be issued within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6. The writ petition is disposed of on the above terms. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 04-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Neutral Citation: Yes/No kj To The Deputy State Tax Officer, (Also known as the Deputy Commercial Tax Officer), Gugai Circle Salem, Room No.126, 1st Floor, Integrated commercial Taxes Building, No.17, Pitchards Road, Hasthampatty, Salem-7. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 18015 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. KJ WP No. 18015 of 2026 and WMP.Nos.19364 & 19367 of 2026 04-06-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis