IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H ARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (158) CRM-M-38299-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision:-16.07.2026 KULDIP … Petitioner Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present: Mr. Rohit Mittal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. R.K. Ambavta, DAG Haryana. **** VIRINDER AGGARWAL , J . (Oral) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he intends to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file a fresh one with better particulars. 2. In view of this, the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. 3. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, are also disposed of. (VIRINDER AGGARWAL) 16th July, 2026 JUDGE Poonam Whether reasoned / speaking? Yes / No Whether reportable? Yes / No POONAM 2026.07.16 18:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document