285 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-19356-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 15.07.2026 Addpuran Kaur ......Petitioner Vs. State of U.T., Chandigarh and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present: Mr. Yuvraj Baldev Singh Aulakh, Advocate, for Mr. Manish Gilhotra, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Surinder Garg, Advocate, for the respondents. **** SUDEEPTI SHARMA J. (ORAL) 1. The present writ petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing respondents No.1 and 2 to declare forthwith the 6th Semester result of the petitioner. 2. Mr. Surinder Garg, Advocate, has put in appearance and filed his Power of Attorney on behalf of the respondents. He submits that the relief asked for in the present writ petition has already been granted. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the same. 4. In view of the above, the present writ petition has been rendered infructuous and is accordingly dismissed as such. 5. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (SUDEEPTI SHARMA) JUDGE 15.07.2026 Virender Whether speaking/non-speaking : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No VIRENDRA SINGH ADHIKARI 2026.07.16 11:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document