Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 29682 (MAD)

Vasanth v. The Inspector of Police

CRL OP/13331/2026 · 2026-06-04

C Kumarappan

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL OP No. 13331 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 04-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN CRL OP No. 13331 of 2026 Vasanth ..Petitioner Vs The Inspector of Police T-4, Madhuravoyal P.S., Chennai. Crime No.494/2025 ..Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the Petitioner/Accused -1 on bail in connection with crime No.494/2025 on the file of the Respondent Police. For Petitioner: Mr.Balaji Sankara Moorthy For Respondent: Mr.Yogaraja Sekar Counsel for Government of Tamil Nadu (Criminal Side) ORDER The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 13.07.2025 for the alleged offence under 8 (c) r/w 20(b)(ii)(A), '22(C), 25, 29(1) NDPS Act 1985 in Crime No.494 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 13331 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 2. The case of the prosecution is that A1 was found in possession of 5.25 grams of Methamphetamine in his two wheeler. Hence, this case. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He further submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 13.07.2025 and he is ready to abide by any stringent conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prays to grant bail to the petitioner. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) strongly opposed the bail application on the ground that this Court on 16.04.2026 has dismissed the earlier bail application after considering all the contentions put forth by the learned counsel for the petitioner. He further submitted that there are no changes in the circumstances. Hence, he opposed the grant of bail to the petitioner. 5. I have given my anxious consideration to either side submissions and perused the materials available on record. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case; taking note of the submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side); it is seen https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 13331 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 that this is a case of commercial quantity and the bail application of this petitioner was earlier dismissed on 16.04.2026 and the petitioner could not submit any ground deviating from the earlier finding, thus this Court is of the view that there is no change in circumstances, hence, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 7. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed. 04-06-2026 SHL To: 1. The I Additional Special Judge, Special Court under EC and NDPS Act, Chennai. 2. The Inspector of Police T-4, Madhuravoyal P.S., Chennai. 3. The Public Prosecutor High Court of Madras https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 13331 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 C.KUMARAPPAN J. SHL CRL OP No. 13331 of 2026 04-06-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis