Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 29682 (CHH)

FIRTU RAM PADDA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/5725/2026 · 2026-07-28

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 / 2 CGHC010284292026 2026:CGHC:32543 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 5725 of 2026 1. Firtu Ram Padda S/o Bisru Ram Padda Aged About 69 Years R/o Handpump Technician R/o Village- Kishanpuri (Pando) P.O Kishanpur Tahsil- Narharpur District- Uttar Bastar Kanker (C.G.) 2. Smt Hajaro Bai Padda W/o Sita Ram Padda Aged About 61 Years Village- Kishanpuri (Pando) P.O. Kishanpuri- Tahsil- Narharpur District- Uttar Bastar Kanker (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through- The Secretary, Department Of Public Health Engineer, Mahanadi Bhawan Mantralaya Nawa Raipur District- Raipur (C.G.) 2. Engineer In Chief Department Of Public Health Engineer Raipur, Sector - 19 New Raipur District- Raipur (C.G.) 3. Chief Engineer Department Of Public Health Engineer Jagdalpur, District- Bastar (C.G.) 4. Executive Engineer Department Of Public Health Engineer, Civil Kanker, District- Uttar Bastar Kanker (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) (Cause title is taken from Case Information System) For Petitioners : Mr. Shubham Singh, Advocate For Respondents/ State : Mr. Aditya Tiwari, P.L. (HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE BIBHU DATTA GURU) Order on Board 29/07/2026 1. By the present writ petition, the petitioners are seeking for issuance of an appropriate direction to the Respondent authorities for considering the claim of the Petitioners for grant of leave JYOTI SHARMA Digitally signed by JYOTI SHARMA Date: 2026.07.30 11:22:15 +0530 2 / 2 encashment in terms of the provisions of the Chhattisgarh Work- Charged/Contingency Paid Employees Leave Rules, 1977. 2. According to the petitioners, they have made their claim in the light of the recent decision passed by this Court in W.P.(S) No.3870/2021 (Faguvaram Patel & Others Vs. State of Chhattisgarh & Others) decided on 30.9.2022, wherein similar claim of the petitioners therein has been allowed. The said decision also stands affirmed by the Division Bench in W.A. No.119/2023, decided on 20.6.2023. 3. Given the said facts, the present writ petition is disposed of at this juncture, directing the respondent Authorities to immediately process the claims of all similarly placed person herein in the light of the aforesaid decision passed by this Court on the same subject-matter, within an outer limit of 120 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this Order. 4. With the aforesaid direction, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (BIBHU DATTA GURU) JUDGE Jyoti